Skip to content

What they care about

Case 24-2074 of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, Caldwell v US(A), case 25-2014 of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

    The galaxy's Self-Represented Lawyer Man. Plaintiff of docket # 25-2014 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. PETITION TO SUPREME COURT AND RELATED: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1vQ0-jOdoPPa8_JJ2VO0Ka0SXP6Uf8XHg?usp=sharing
    ALERT! HACKERS ARE ALL OVER ME AND MY ACCOUNT(S), taking down youtube videos from view and all that. the best in the world. Please create a team to stop them. PLEASE, SHOW YOUR APPRECIATION for the self-represented (pro se) attorney who lived on the streets for 20 plus years (but studied), and conceivably LITERALLY saved the world from nuclear warfare. It is detailed in my (legendary) Supreme Court work; possible (GREAT) tax breaks and obligations to return favor, should I get a billy (billion dollars). My Petition: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AJb5QoSZOjTioNWymGprL1Qtv-sURYLi/view?usp=drive_link The Appendix: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ol9d8RCD0nVzkabaA25YcVgIlU75qYhN/view?usp=drive_link The In Forma Pauperis Application(poor man application)(which was appended first ahead of the petition by rule of course)(also note certificate of service was sent, of course, as well): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LMKFnm_keopiu-PIbue4H1VD3T2zl3my/view?usp=drive_link Plaintiff-Appellant of case #25-2014 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Caldwell v USA. Document 23-1 details the Rehearing En Banc the extremely rare court process using ALL of the judges. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Mcx839tG5va1IO2hf-6FwktzLW047K-c?usp=drive_link . ACLU: Offers NO HELP. Anti-Defamation League: Offers NO HELP. Southern Poverty Law Center: Offers NO HELP. From Docket # 49782 of the Supreme Court of Idaho 2021- Complaint. R 1 Vol. 1 p. 122, Docket # 49782, Supreme Court of Idaho, Caldwell v J. Admin. of Idaho et.al. 2021- 2021 Dismissal WITH Prejudice. 2022- Dismissed with prejudice. 2022- for reasons as stated 2022- Reason for Dismissal. Supreme Idaho- lost case Affirmed. 23-320 24-1122 Not lacking merit Doc 6 Doc 1 - statement July 30 dismissal From Doc 18 case 24-2074 From Doc29, case 25-2014: From Doc 30, case 25-2014 From Doc32, case 25-2014: Doc 1: Page 134, Doc 6. Discarded petition. Page 20, Doc1: