Create Awareness of Historic Event from SCOTUS

74-YEAR-OLD DISABLED MAN WITH USE OF ONLY ONE FINGER WILL HAVE ALL NINE U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HEAR HIS PRO SE PETITION. THIS IS HISTORIC

I am Bill Windsor. I am 74 years old, disabled, and in Chapter 13 bankruptcy. I have the use of only one finger. I can't walk. I live alone full-time in an RV. This should be major national news, but I don't have a big, expensive law firm to issue news releases. I NEED YOU!

On May 25, 2023, I filed a petition with the United States Supreme Court. I typed every word with my right index finger and the mouse. U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS GAVE MY PETITION A BIG THUMBS UP.

I qualified for In Forma Pauperis, ALL of the justices have now been sent Bill Windsor‘s Petition for consideration on September 26, 2023.

The main issue is so fundamental that it’s hard to imagine that I won’t get 18 Thumbs Up. But they grant very few original petitions for extraordinary relief. I think they should give it to me just for being able to type a 77-page document with only one finger.

I am VERY EXCITED about this because a personal goal has been to set some precedents that could benefit other pro se parties. This will do that.

This may be EXTRA SPECIAL because I have been able to find just one U.S. Supreme Court Petition from a Pro Se Party that was granted. Mine could be the second and the first one in 52 years.

In the past decade, approximately 7,000-8,000 new cases are filed in the United States Supreme Court each year. Plenary review, with oral arguments by attorneys, is granted in about 80 of those cases, and the Court typically disposes of about 100 or more cases without plenary review — fewer than 3% of the total.

Can you even imagine the significance? My Petition is one of 8,000. 180 of those get reviewed, and mine is one of those 180.

I’m proud….and just a little bit humble.

The Petition is about pro se rights. One of my favorite lines in it is: “Poor people deserve justice, too.”

You can read my Petition here -- https://lawlessamerica.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/USSC-Petition-for-Writ-of-Mandamus-Prohibition-2023-05-15.pdf

Very, very, very few attorneys ever get to have a case before the United States Supreme Court. This is my second. Nanny Nanny Boo Boo.

I hope this case gets national publicity. That will be great for the fight against INjustice and corruption.

On September 26, 2023, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, and Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson will sit around a table in DC and decide if they will grant William Michael Windsor’s Pro Se Petition.

Approximately 8,000 petitions were submitted. 180 made the cut, and mine is one of the 180 to be decided by THE SUPREMES.

*** *** ***

These are the QUESTIONS PRESENTED for the consideration of the justices:

The Petitioner brought suit in Case No. 2011-CV-200971 in the Superior Court of Fulton County Georgia for Violation of state laws.

Case No. 2011-CV-200971 was unlawfully removed to federal court where the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (“DISTRICT COURT) never addressed the removal and never determined jurisdiction. A series of Void Orders and Void Judgments were issued by the DISTRICT COURT, including Permanent Injunction Orders that purported to deny William M. Windsor (“WINDSOR) the right to file any action in a state court anywhere in America.

WINDSOR was denied appeals by wrongful denial of In Forma Pauperis status.

This Petition arises out of orders in the DISTRICT COURT and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ELEVENTH CIRCUIT (“11TH CIRCUIT”).

I. Is a federal court order void when jurisdiction is never determined? If so, every order of the DISTRICT COURT and 11TH CIRCUIT is invalid, and this Court’s task is simple.

II. Does a federal court judge lack jurisdiction to place restrictions on the operation of state courts?

III. Is a federal court order placing restrictions on the operation of state courts a void order?

IV. Did the 11TH CIRCUIT err by denying appeals of WINDSOR that incorporate the jurisdiction issue and the state court authority issue?

V. Did the DISTRICT COURT and the 11TH CIRCUIT err by denying In Forma Pauperis status to WINDSOR?

VI. Are there exceptional circumstances that require this Court to issue a Writ?

*** *** ***

The impact may be that we will have a modern-day U.S. Supreme Court decision clarifying what constitutes a void order.

We will have the first-ever U.S. Supreme Court decision declaring federal courts have no jurisdiction over state court matters. The Eleventh Circuit should be hammered for making me the only appellant in history who can’t file anything in a state court. Hundreds of decisions of appellate courts make it clear that federal courts have no jurisdiction over state courts. The Eleventh Circuit has said so repeatedly, except in my cases. LMFAO.

Hopefully, the Court will clarify that far more people will qualify for indigent status — those in bankruptcy and those from states that do not have community property.

Bottom Line: This Windsor case will be cited by attorneys and courts forever.

I need your help. The corrupt judges in America will not want to see our fellow Americans learn about this.