Hong Kong's Fight for Equality and Justice

For over 150 years, Hong Kong existed as a British colony, a vibrant entrepôt where East met West. This era, marked by both progress and inequality, indelibly shaped the city's identity and its people. While British rule brought infrastructure development, a (relatively) independent legal system, and economic opportunity, it also denied Hong Kongers full democratic participation and left a legacy of complex national identity. This legacy differs from that of many other former British colonies, where the path to independence and self-determination was clearer. Hong Kong, uniquely, was handed over to China, a nation with vastly different values and governance.

Unlike many former British colonies that ultimately achieved full self-determination, Hong Kong’s fate was decided for it, rather than by it. This leaves Hong Kongers in a precarious position, lacking the full rights and protections enjoyed by citizens of independent nations. It is this historical context that sets Hong Kong apart and justifies its demand for a just and equitable outcome.

The intricacies of British nationality law further complicate matters. Over the years, Hong Kong residents have held various statuses: BOTC (British Overseas Territories Citizen), BOC (British Overseas Citizen), BC (British Citizen), BDTC (British Dependent Territories Citizen), and, most notably, BNO (British National Overseas). BNO status, created in anticipation of the 1997 handover, was meant to provide a link to the UK. However, it offered limited rights and protections.

This stark inequality is exemplified by the fact that children born in the UK to BNO visa holders are not automatically granted British citizenship. This creates a situation where families who have made the UK their home face uncertainty and insecurity regarding their children's future. It is a discriminatory policy that undermines the very foundation of family life.

The threat to Hong Kong's autonomy became chillingly real in 2019 with the introduction of the Extradition Law (逃犯條例). This controversial bill, which would have allowed the extradition of individuals to mainland China, sparked massive protests and revealed deep-seated fears about the erosion of Hong Kong's freedoms. This law was perceived as a direct assault on Hong Kong’s cherished rule of law, its independent judiciary, and the fundamental right to free speech.

Now, that fear is being rekindled as the British government considers re-establishing an extradition route with Hong Kong. This potential betrayal is a slap in the face to the hundreds of thousands of Hong Kongers who sought refuge in the UK, and a chilling signal that economic expediency may trump human rights concerns.

In response to the escalating crisis, the UK government introduced the BNO visa scheme, offering a pathway to residency and eventual citizenship for BNO holders and their dependents. While this was a welcome step, it is not a complete solution. It does not address the fundamental issues of political freedom and human rights in Hong Kong. And most importantly, it does not offer a clear route for those with BNO passports who have been politically charged by the Hong Kong government.

The freedoms of speech, assembly, and expression—once hallmarks of Hong Kong society—are now under constant attack. The National Security Law has silenced dissent, stifled independent media, and created a climate of fear. Those who dare to speak out against the government risk imprisonment and persecution. We should remember those BNO passport holders who have been charged previously by political powers and who are not entitled to such protections.

Furthermore, the Sino-British Joint Declaration, intended to guarantee Hong Kong's autonomy for 50 years, has proved to be a hollow promise. Instead of acting as a safeguard for Hong Kong's rights, the Joint Declaration has often been used by the British government as an excuse not to offer further assistance, claiming that doing so would violate the agreement. This cynical and disingenuous stance ignores the moral and historical obligations the UK holds towards the people of Hong Kong.

We believe that the UK has a moral and legal duty to stand with Hong Kong and actively protect the freedoms and rights once guaranteed. We need your support to fight for equality, justice, and a future where Hong Kongers can live without fear. Please donate today and help us make a difference.

All donated funds will be used exclusive for preparing and initiating legal action. No payment will be made to the organisers.