Help Protect Seattle's Orcas and Trees

Thank you for your generous support of this appeal to protect our beloved Southern Resident Killer Whales, human health, trees, and the ecosystem while adding housing. This fundraiser will continue under new management at this link. Please share!

In early 2025, we filed an appeal of the Comp Plan Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) asking the city to study the impacts of increased tree removals and resultant stormwater increases on the endangered orcas and salmon. Despite having the required standing to comment before the DEIS deadline, this appeal was dismissed on 4/11/25. While this dangerous and exclusionary decision was not entirely unexpected, it effectively removes the public right to use the established appeal process on a faulty EIS. People deserve the right to appeal decisions that impact human and ecosystem health, which are inextricably connected. Building can and should occur in ways that preserve human health, orcas, and trees. There was likely an incredible amount of pressure on the Hearing Examiner.

Appealing the Motion to Dismiss is just one step in the process. We have amazing legal counsel, expert witnesses, and exhibits. This fundraiser will continue under new management for the Writ to appeal the Dismissal, filed 4/28/25. If this Writ is granted, we will have the ability to pursue our original appeal of the EIS to protect trees, orcas, and human health.

Follow us on Instagram! We will be presenting local talks by our phenomenal expert witness lineup, so everyone can access the hearing the City didn't want the public to hear. We are inspired by the recent birth of J63 to J40.

The appeal:

Seattle’s Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the One Seattle Plan doesn’t adequately assess the adverse environmental impacts on the 73 critically endangered Southern Resident Killer Whales (SRKW), salmon, or water quality, despite NOAA recommending highest population Puget Sound cities reduce polluted runoff. In fact, the One Seattle Plan will likely increase polluted runoff.

In April 2024 I asked the City why the Draft EIS didn’t mention killer whales once in the entire document. According to the EIS, "the only ESA listed or state listed species known or expected to use Seattle as habitat are fish" which excludes our critically endangered orcas and some bird species. The City subsequently added language to the FEIS admitting it’s not feasible to maintain past animal population levels due to damage caused by Euro-American colonization. These statements fly in the face of current water quality improvements in Lake Washington and Elliot Bay; improvements which prove Seattle has the capacity — and therefore duty — to improve wildlife habitat.

Urban Forest Considerations

Trees, especially mature trees, reduce and filter polluted runoff (source: King County DNRP, EPA, USDA), yet the One Seattle Plan EIS does not consider the additional runoff that will be caused by a marked increase in large tree removals likely to occur with increased density and a failing tree ordinance. The additional stormwater no longer being absorbed by these trees should be assessed in the EIS. For example, the City of Shoreline found 227 million gallons of stormwater was prevented by their urban canopy, saving the city over $2 million annually. Building can and should occur in ways that preserve trees.

The link between trees and orcas

In loving memory of J35 Tahlequah's daughter, J61, we ask Seattle to follow the Federal NOAA SRKW Recovery Plan Guidelines and not increase polluted runoff by allowing even more mature tree removals in the One Seattle Plan. These beloved giants are telling us through their rising death rates that they cannot handle dramatic, further rollbacks of their habitat and food sources that the One Seattle Plan will create.

Donations will go toward hearing costs. Any money unspent at the end of the hearing will be donated to tree and orca protection nonprofits.