STOP THE POISONING!!

$5,463 of $8,000 goal

Raised by 67 people in 26 months
STOP THE POISONING‼️
This work continues unabated in 2017; progress has brought additional challenges beyond Washington.  Please be sure to read the latest UPDATES, including new research, associated meetings and events.

BACKGROUND
I need to go to Washington to stop the use of glyphosate (a primary ingredient of Roundup®). Know anyone with gut problems? This herbicide contaminates our bodies, mother’s breast milk, most of our food, drinking water, wine and beer, cotton sterile gauze, tampons, pet and livestock feed, and pollutes the environment. It has been linked to many disorders, including: birth defects, gluten intolerance, cancer, autism, dementia, obesity, dead butterflies and honeybees, crippled elk, and climate change. The World Health Organization has deemed glyphosate a potential human carcinogen.

Glyphosate is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and one of the most dangerous toxic substances ever created. For 40+ years, it has been registered by the EPA for widespread home, aquatic, and agricultural use! Right now, all over the nation, this poison is being sprayed on our food crops, and at our homes, schools, playgrounds, parks, roadsides, hiking trails and forests. Such practices are unethical, unsafe, and probably unlawful.

I am Dr. Stephen Frantz, a research scientist concerned about the effects of glyphosate on us and future generations. Eight months ago, I wrote an article about glyphosate that caught the attention of Congressman Ted Lieu who has asked me to assemble a delegation of independent scientists to go to Washington to meet with EPA scientists (see: https://www.laprogressive.com/glyphosate/).

ACTIONS
A congressional staff briefing plus an all-day meeting with EPA scientists is scheduled for June 14, 2016 in Washington, DC. A senatorial briefing will occur on June 15. My delegation of a dozen scientists represents disciplines from basic glyphosate research to regenerative biological (organic) agriculture. The goal is to stop the registration renewal for glyphosate because it poses unreasonable risks to humans, animals, and the environment; and to underscore that safer alternative agricultural practices can sustain the agricultural sector. With success, this work will benefit everyone, and the environment.

THE NEED
What began as a volunteer effort has evolved into a full-time job that has outstripped my financial resources (I’m retired). Funding is urgently needed for my travel, additional research, laboratory work, and related expenses. I am asking for donations of $3700 to provide the basic necessities. This effort has gained traction, but will require more travel and additional resources to succeed after the June meetings.

Glyphosate contaminates everything — our bodies, our kids, pets, wildlife, the food chain, and the environment. Please donate now to help outlaw this scourge that every day is causing some degree of illness within each of us, our children, and our pets…whether we are aware of it or not!
+ Read More
Last night on KPFK's "California Solartopia" radio show, I followed up on my earlier non-Hodgkin lymphoma litigation post, and further discussed glyphosate, as well as glyphosate contamination of vaccines. In the photo below, I'm in the studio with with show host Harvey "Sluggo" Wasserman and co-host Myla Reson. We did briefly discuss the non-Hodgkin lymphoma litigation that is about to begin in San Francisco; selection of the jury was finally completed yesterday and the trial is to begin July 9th. The very damaging nature of glyphosate to all life forms was reviewed last night, in particular its carcinogenic and many other morbiditiy effects. The focus then shifted to the Aug. 2016 findings of glyphosate in the nation's vaccine supply as reported by Zen Honeycutt (Mom's Across America) and in a peer-reviewed study by my colleagues Anthony Samsel and Stephanie Seneff. This contamination takes on a more ominous reality with CA's mandatory vaccine bill (SB-277) where parent's are now required to have their children injected with weed killer (glyphosate). Hence, when this discovery was made, I discussed it with Sen. Ben Allen, the co-author of SB-277. He was very concerned about his role in what must be considered a dangerous, ill-advised practice. And I continued that discussion in detailed communications thru Nov. 2016, and in person at several political events thereafter. He noted that it may be necessary to have hearings to review the contamination issue, propose legislation, etc.; however, absolutely nothing has been done to mitigate this situation. In fact, I initiated a petition to "CLEAN UP THE VACCINE SUPPLY" (detailed elsewhere in my FB posts), essentially asking for legislation that would require vaccine manufacturers to remove all contaminants and other ingredients that are linked to unintended consequences (including, but not limited to, glyphosate, mercury and aluminum). On last night's show, Harvey Wasserman did an on-air first, and signed the petition to join more than 400 others who have signed during various meetings I've attended. It is clear that people do not want to be pumping weed killer into their kids; why would anyone want this? Note that in every MMRII/Merck 0.5ml dose of vaccine, as much as 6.6 billion molecules of glyphosate is essentially injected into the bloodstream -- every molecule has the opportunity to alter protein formation and disrupt biological functions that can lead to dis-ease, including alteration of one's DNA. I think we cannot continue to rely on empty promises and false hope and it is up to Sen Allen to immediately take progressive actions on the issue of vaccine contamination; this could be an important part on his current re-election campaign. When informed, people do vote on issues important to them. It seems odd to me that in the CA legislature, SB-277 was popular with Democrats, not Republicans. To quote Albert Einstein. "What is right is not always popular, and what is popular is not always right."
[Correction re. last night's show on KPFK: I do wish that I could claim some role in bringing the NHL trial to fruition, but it was all thru the fine efforts of the co-lead law firms of Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman (CA) and the Miller Firm (VA).]
+ Read More
While I have not posted anything recently (life gets in the way sometimes), I just stumbled across a 2013 animation that remains quite up-to-date and nicely summarizes much of the glyphosate/GMO issue. It is particularly relevant to view this at this time because in San Francisco this week begins the lawsuit by DeWayne "Lee" Johnson, non-Hodgkin lymphoma patient, against Monsanto. Lee was a groundskeeper for the Benicia Unified School District (Solano County, CA), he applied glyphosate-based herbicides for about 3 years, and, as of January 2018, at least 80 percent of his body was covered by lesions (see photo). Early in his illness, Lee contacted (wrote and called) Monsanto to see if his condition could be linked to his use of glyphosate, but Monsanto never answered his inquiries. This will be a trial by jury that Monsanto is already complaining about because they say the potential jurors think their company is evil -- hummm, wonder why? Glyphosate is believed to have caused NHL in many people - groundskeepers, landscapers, farmers, farm workers, gardeners, etc.- and this is one of more than a thousand NHL cases nationwide. For the glyphosate/GMO animated film, go to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDlmlXiuuDU
+ Read More
Yesterday, the PDSMM blog posted, "Looks like GMOs will be labelled" with an accompanying article from the New York Times (05/12/2018) by Amy Harmon, “G.M.O. Foods Will Soon Require Labels. What Will the Labels Say?” This NYT article is jam-packed with significant incomplete, misleading and incorrect information regarding the labelling of GMO foods (= GE or genetically engineered foods) and the many associated health and safety issues. It not only fails to accurately clarify the health and environmental problems with GE foods per se, including glyphosate-based herbicide (GBH) tolerant GE crops (e.g., RoundUp Ready crops), but also fails to note the related problems with pre-harvest desiccant spraying with GBHs on certain non-GE crops (e.g., grains, peanuts, potatoes). These are interrelated problems of the U.S. industrial agriculture food production system. We should all be concerned by such irresponsible selective reporting that appears to neither recognize nor understand industry-sponsored science (e.g., Monsanto, Syngenta) and the collusion with these self-serving industries by U.S. government agencies (e.g., EPA, FDA) and universities (e.g., Cornell, Penn State). To learn more about such collusion, please review: "Silencing Scientists: A Case Study in How the Chemical Industry Attempts to Influence Science". Minority Report, U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space & Technology, February 2018 ( https://democrats-science.house.gov/sites/democrats.science.house.gov/files/documents/02.06.2018%20-%20Spinning%20Science%20and%20Silencing%20Scientists.pdf).

Rather than writing a point-by-point critique of the NYT article, I would direct readers to watch two excellent presentations by independent scientists in relevant fields who have been willing to let us know the truth about genetic engineering (and the ubiquitous GBHs in agriculture), and why it is not, and likely will never be, a consistently safe technology for widespread application. The first presentation, "Yes! GMOs Are Definitely Toxic", is by Dr. Thierry Vrain, a retired genetic engineer and soil biologist. He was a member of the team of scientists that I took to Washington in 2016 at Congressman Ted Lieu’s invitation. Dr. Vrain is the former: Head, Biotechnology Section, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVolljHmqEs). The second presentation, “GMO's - Are We Gambling with Our Health” is by Dr. Lorrin Pang, District Health Officer, Maui, HI who, for many years, has studied and consulted on evolving GE technologies and the health consequences of same (see: https://youtu.be/RCGIf0GSwX8).

While the biotech industry likes to say that GE foods have no adverse effects, they are patently incorrect because when we actually take the time conduct sufficiently long-term studies and do retrospective data analyses, we find the many adverse effects that are discussed by Dr. Vrain, Dr. Pang, and others (including Stephanie Seneff and Anthony Samsel who are cited). Genetic engineering is damaging in many ways to humans and other life forms; and by the time one determines harm, it typically is too late — think cancer, birth defects, and various strange unintended consequences.

Diet is considered as one of the main drivers in shaping the gut microbiota across one’s life time. It’s complicated, but when you damage the quality and quantity of the hundred trillion microbes (largely bacteria) in your gut microbiome, you can expect some degree of morbidity and mortality. Those microbes communicate with each other and with all organs, including the brain; they essentially run your body and regulate your immune system. A healthy gut microbiome is absolutely essential for good health. GE foods and their associated genetic promoters and markers, and pesticides such as glyphosate, can and do interfere with: human protein structures (we have more than 100,000 proteins to consider); with the overall composition and balance of gut microbial species (we have more than 2100 species); and also damage the gut lining. A moratorium on release of any GE life forms is logically mandated by the precautionary principle. Adequate risk assessments of GE foods by independent scientists are lacking and it is irresponsible on the part of our regulatory agencies to allow (as they already have done repeatedly) release of genetically modified and genetically contaminated life forms into the environment — it’s like releasing the genie that we can’t put back in the bottle — the long-term consequences are unpredictable and irreversible and should not be allowed. Further, any such release should also require informed consent by all individuals likely to be affected…and I know of no such consent regarding the release of GE crops in agriculture and GE foods in the marketplace.

In 2009, the American Academy of of Environmental Medicine recommended that physicians tell their patients to avoid GM foods and for them to document the possible role of GM foods in the disease processes of their patients. There was a clear concern and a need for relevant data. The American Academy of Pediatrics (2016) recommended limiting children’s exposure to pesticides by minimizing foods in which chemical pesticides were used by farmers. It was also recommended that foods should be accurately labelled so consumers could avoid pesticides. Note that effective avoidance of such pesticide exposures would include GE, GBH tolerant and desiccant sprayed crops. According to Dr. Vrain, when Diane Sawyer (ABC News) questioned Dr. Richard Besser (then Chief Health and Medical Editor at ABC News; and former director of CDC) on how to reduce childhood exposure to pesticides, he simply recommended eating organic foods. Since the basic American diet is currently comprised largely of GE and GBH sprayed crops, it is scientifically and medically logical to go organic and to require accurate, easy to understand labelling of pesticide contaminated foods (that would include all GE & those GBH sprayed). U.S. food production must change because GE crops and resultant genetic contamination give us a food system that is not sustainable, is not healthy, is not safe, and contributes heavily to the climate crisis. Unfortunately, the aforementioned recommendations for promoting a healthy and safe food system are not reflected in the content of the NYT article that struggles to convince us that “labelling” (that might be essentially nonfunctional and/or misleading at best) is the necessary cure-all to the GMO controversy.

[FYI, the NYT article can be found at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/12/us/gmo-food-labels-usda.html?hpw&rref=us&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=well-region&region=bottom-well&WT.nav=bottom-well
+ Read More
STOP FAKE ORGANIC FOOD
In 2016, I authored an organic fraud resolution that was approved (passed) by the California Democratic Party as CDP Resolution 16-11.08 — Resolution Regarding Fraudulent Organic Products (see attached). In essence, this is to protect consumers from fake organic foods that continue to deliver glyphosate and other toxic ingredients to individuals who wish to protect their health and the health of the environment; and it makes such fraud a criminal offense. It also protects the ethical producers of genuine organic products that adhere to the letter and spirit of the organic movement promoting soil stewardship, nutrient dense produce, humane animal husbandry, and regenerative ecosystems. In early 2016, this resolution was sent to newly elected Sen. Henry Stern for conversion into a bill for the legislature. On numerous occasions, I have followed up with Sen. Stern and staff to learn the status of any such legislation, but a bill has not been forthcoming. Meanwhile organic fraud has become more widespread (the USDA has too few staff and poor guidelines for proper inspection); and, a State “organic fraud bill” is needed more than ever. It’s time for us to ask for action from any legislator who will provide active support; this is an issue that negatively affects all of us. If we do this in California, it should have a rippling effect nationwide. Or, if concerned legislators in any state(s) will support such a bill, let them take the leading position, but let's see it happen.

In a correlative national action, the Cornucopia Institute has just initiated a campaign to convince CEOs of some major retailers to conform to genuine organic standards and stop selling fake organics (see: https://www.cornucopia.org/2017/11/demand-real-organic-food-real-organic-farmers/ ). I encourage everyone to go to this website, download the proxy letter, print, sign and return it to Cornucopia for them to deliver. See attached graphic. Thank you to Zen Honeycutt (Mom’s Across America) for alerting me to this important campaign.
Cornucopia Institute's Campaign
+ Read More
Read a Previous Update
Rachel Chaput
5 months ago

is it any wonder we have hardly any insects or birds left?

+ Read More

$5,463 of $8,000 goal

Raised by 67 people in 26 months
Created May 6, 2016
Your share could be bringing in donations. Sign in to track your impact.
   Connect
We will never post without your permission.
In the future, we'll let you know if your sharing brings in any donations.
We weren't able to connect your Facebook account. Please try again later.
MZ
$25
Mark Zimoski
1 month ago

Though depressingly informative, thanks for coming to our PDA meeting last night to help move folks toward action.

$10
Paul Stillman
4 months ago

Thanks for the good work, Stephen!

$30
Tony Luboff
7 months ago

This is an issue close to my heart. We love the progression of different bees visiting us in our field. Bee colony collapse is one of the victims of roundup and most countries realize this and have put a stop to it but not the US yet. Thank you for your efforts!

$20
Kory Muniz
7 months ago

You are an amazing man. Thank you, Stephen, for all your hard work. I wish I could donate more♥

SS
$50
Steven Schwartzberg
8 months ago

Best wishes to an amazing person

$10
Carolyn Waters
8 months ago

Stephen, thank you for all the work you do. carolyn waters, Hermosa Beach.

$5
Anonymous
8 months ago
DE
$50
debra elliott
14 months ago

Thank you for the fight

Rachel Chaput
5 months ago

is it any wonder we have hardly any insects or birds left?

+ Read More
or
Or, use your email…
Use My Email Address
By continuing, you agree with the GoFundMe
terms and privacy policy
There's an issue with this Campaign Organizer's account. Our team has contacted them with the solution! Please ask them to sign in to GoFundMe and check their account. Return to Campaign

Are you ready for the next step?
Even a $5 donation can help!
Donate Now Not now
Connect on Facebook to keep track of how many donations your share brings.
We will never post on Facebook without your permission.