Judicial Reform Supreme Crt Cases
Donation protected
A message from my Mom and Spencer’s Nanna. Thanks Mom for all of your love and un-wavering support!!!
____________________________________________________________
February 6, 2016
Although Kimberly has joint custody of her son Spencer, she has for the past 8 years struggled with her ex-attorney husband and the court system to see him.
The last time Kimberly saw Spencer, he was approximately 3 years old. The last time she spoke with him was on Mother's Day 2015 - 9 months ago.
Because Kimberly has not seen Spencer in approximately 3 years, as a parent-especially a mother, I cannot begin to imagine the heart wrenching pain that surely grips her heart. Not to be able to fix his boo boos, or comfort Spencer when he is sniffling with a cold, not to hold him close to her bosom and kiss him on the cheek or forehead to make everything ok. Not being able to share in all the joys of being a mother has been devastating and emotionally draining.
Not to mention the countless missed holidays and special occasions....not being able to wish your only child a Happy Birthday, or receiving the Mother's Day Cards that the kids make in school, no Christmas wishes or waking up on Christmas Day to see the sparkle in your child's eyes as he opened his Christmas presents, no shared New Year's Days, no shared family gatherings.
Despite the emotional roller coaster, Kimberly has preserved. Of the 9 pending cases she has with the U.S. Supreme Court, two of them have been accepted and reviewed by the Justices. What that means is that the U.S. Supreme Court only accepts cases where there have been violations of Constitutional rights AND of the 16,000 cases received per year by the court, only 8,000 of them are docketed. Finally, only 1 percent of the cases are heard by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices. Kimberly's cases made the 1%.
This whole process has been financially draining. Kimberly has no money; however, she still has a mortgage payment, car note, health insurance payments, and printing/postage expenses.
Won't you support Kimberly's efforts in helping to not only reunite her with her son Spencer but to also change the laws so that NO one else has to endure what she has experienced in these last 9 years.
Please show your support with your donation of any amount by going to the following link.
For details about the cases, please visit WhatsBest4Spencer.com, https://www.facebook.com/kimberly.spence.33, http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/president-barack-obama-9?source=c.em&r_by=506764 or gofund.me/vzen8e8s
Thank you for your support.
Spencer's Grandma
Sheila Spence
____________________________________________________________
Please copy and paste the below message and send it out to all of your contacts. Thanks!
Beginning of February 6, 2016 message…
____________________________________________________________
Hello Everyone!!!
The days leading up to the U.S. Supreme Court Deadline to come up with the Docketing and Printing Fees for Case NO 15-6566 (Representing the State of North Carolina) and 15-6567 (Representing the State of Georgia) were pretty thrilling to put it mildly.
On Thursday, January 28th, I received an after-hours follow-up call from Jeff Atkins (THANK YOU!) who oversees Michael Duggan (THANK YOU!), the primary Clerks assigned to process my case information and received FABULOUS news!!!
The first of my four emergency filings (2 Motions and 2 Applications were filed) were granted by Chief Justice John Roberts (THANK YOU, THANK YOU SINCERELY!!!).
Days later on February 1, 2016, I spoke with Jeff Atkins again (Thank You) and he advised that Republican Justice Clarence Thomas followed Chief Justice John Roberts lead and granted my second of two emergency filings.
The granting of my two Applications to Extend time for payment of docketing fees and printing costs for Case NO 15-6566 (North Carolina) and Case NO 15-6567 (Georgia), provide the court enough time to re-consider separate Motions to reconsider In Forma Pauperis status on both cases.
*Motions on In Forma Pauperis determine a citizen’s ability to skip having to pay for Court fees and the cost of printing each case filing 40 TIMES. Who knows why and for what reason each case filing or item needs to be printed 40 times. I don’t know why there is a need and certainly don’t understand the rationale in this day and age of technology, wherein all documents are scanned in electronically via PACER (our tax payer funded- public information – case viewing/ research site that all citizens have to pay to use in order to access relevant information related to cases.). I also don’t understand the rational of allowing Attorney’s the ability to file their court documents electronically (without the same exorbitant costs) via the tax payer funded system (PACER), but not allowing Pro Se (non- Attorney’s) citizens the same right to access the same system that they are paying for via their hard earned tax payer dollars. Yes, this is also another example of an Error listed in the cases. LOL, back to my main point.
The granting of the Application to Extend Time pushes back the deadline to pay for immediate costs associated with the North Carolina (Case NO. 15-6566) and Georgia (Case NO 15-6567) Cases from February 1, 2016 to April 1, 2016!!!
This is super- fabulous news for not only William Windsor, Spencer and I… but super-duper fabulous news for all citizens!!! The relevant cases pertaining to providing ALL citizens with access to their inalienable constitutional rights are just that much closer than they were a month… a year… two years… a decade and even several decades ago. The glass is half full!!!
But that’s NOT ALL!!!
On February 3, 2016, I received notice that the U.S. Supreme Court Justices will meet on February 19, 2016 in private Conference to hear and rule on my final two emergency Motions. They pertain to my right to have and continue proceeding with the cases with In Forma Pauperis status.
Click on the below links to see a screenshot of the U.S. Supreme Courts latest notice...
Case NO 15-6566 - http://bit.ly/20O7zIo
Case NO - 15-6567 - http://bit.ly/1Qk3yEf
This is HUGE!!! If my Motion to reconsider GRANTING In Forma Pauperis status is Denied, the immediate costs will include a…
1. $300.00 docketing fee
2. approximately $500.00 for custom booklets (printed 40 time as required by the rules of the U.S. Supreme Court ) and
3. approximately $150.00 for the certified postage
The Total cost for each of the two cases will be approximately $950.00 and this DOES NOT include the cost of printing the Briefs for each of the cases 40 times in custom booklet form; printing the Response Briefs 40 times in custom booklet form for each of the other seven Spence cases; filing any other additional motions 40 times in custom booklet form; shipping the documents back and forth to the U.S. Supreme Court via certified mail; my time and an assistants time away from work to prepare the documents for submission to the U.S. Supreme Court; associated costs related to travel (Hotel, Transportation, Meals, etc.) to and from DC in the event that Oral Arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court are granted, etc. or my time away from work to continue this successful create awareness campaign with Insiders and the General Public.
Again, the U.S. Supreme Court Justices ruling on In Forma Pauperis status will be HUGE!!! February 19, 2016 is fast approaching and we still yet have work to do!!! Please continue shifting your gifts, time, talent, finances, vision, etc… no matter your political affiliation, race, class, gender, creed or sexual orientation to ensure that the Windsor-Spence cases are rightfully heard and ruled on by the U.S. Supreme Court. William Windsor and I have done all that we can do to ensure the success of the case. NOW it’s up to you!!!
On that note, I would sincerely like to THANK ALL TEAMS, Insiders and Supporters for creating the type of awareness that warranted such a swift- positive response from the U.S. Supreme Court over these last critical few weeks!!! YOU ROCK!!!
Please continue your hard work and encourage other Insiders, Supporters and likeminded “We the People citizens to continuing shifting the use of their gifts, time, talents, finances, vision, etc. away from Political “Leaders”, Political Parties and elections and TOWARDS using their gifts, time, talent, finances, vision, etc…. to help create THE better America that we all desire and envision… right NOW… AND for the future of our children, our children’s children and this nation!
Thank you sincerely and keep up the great work!!!
Kimberly
Title: Spencer's Mom
WhatsBest4Spencer.com, the approachable- 350+ Million Views- Public Persona that WORKS!
Summary… U.S. Supreme Court Windsor-Spence Case - NOs. 15-6566 and 15-6567 involve Enumerations of Error and / or Questions pertaining to the Best Interest of a Child, States’ Rights to Govern as it Pleases, Mass Incarceration, Judicial Reform and Public Servant Accountability. You may find quick updates about the cases here… https://www.facebook.com/kimberly.spence.33 here… http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/president-barack-obama-9?source=c.em&r_by=506764 or here… gofund.me/vzen8e8s
_________________________________________________________
End of Message
Initial GoFundMe Message...
____________________________________________________________
Hi!
My name is Kimberly Spence, mother to soon to be eight year old Spencer. Like you, I want to protect the best interest of children and families.
That's why I currently have cases pending before the Supreme Court of the United States regarding not only my right to see Spencer, but involving Public Servant Accountability, Judicial Reform, Mass Incarceration, States Rights to Govern as it Pleases, the Best Interest of a Child and a whole host of other key policy issues designed to transform this nation into a better America RIGHT NOW… for ourselves... for the future of our children and for the future of this nation.
The U.S. Supreme Court Justices met in PRIVATE conference on January 8, 2016 to determine new national laws based on only two of my nine Pro Se Cases. Case No. 15-6566 ( http://bit.ly/1l1ITMl - representing the State of North Carolina) and U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 15-6567 (http://bit.ly/1ZYBTjk - representing the State of Georgia) were properly Joined December 3, 2015.
It should be noted that my initial three U.S. Supreme Court cases were filled in 2012 (four years ago) and I have been in and out of court “systems” in two separate States for more than seven long years in an attempt to access my inalienable Constitutional Rights, seek justice and ensure the proper return of my son Spencer.
I have not been allowed to legally (Due to a fraudulent Judicial Order that left me with Joint Custody, but an inability to physically see Spencer. My ex-husband is an Attorney who willfully and erroneously manipulated the “system” .) see Spencer since May 21, 2013 or physically see Spencer in 2 ½ years. Additionally, I have not been allowed to speak with Spencer since May of 2015 (Mother's Day).
Finally, on August 30, 2013, President Obama and then Attorney General Eric Holder (via a U.S. Department of Justice Response to my 22nd Federal Complaint) stated that they didn't want the "Responsibility of Enforcing" the Constitution. http://bit.ly/1GFSaE5
However, just in case they were joking (hee-hee-hee), I filed the 25th+ (I stopped counting after 25) Federal Complaint with our new Attorney General, Loretta Lynch (Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc.).
Oh and just in case they weren’t lying, I have good news!
ALL politicians and / or tax payer funded public servants report to... We the People!!!
AND... that’s where you come in!!!
I really- really- really need your help.
Will you take a moment to donate $10.00…
or how about $5.00…
heck, how about a dollar!!!
LOL... I’ll take a $1.00.
Believe me, no amount is too large or too small to help offset the cost of mounting expenses related to ensuring that America's historic Windsor-Spence cases are finally filed, date stamped, docketed, joined, heard and ruled on via Conference by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices.
So here's an update on the nine Spence cases...
The U.S. Supreme Court issued an Orderin January 11, 2016 requiring that I PAY for ADDITIONAL Expenses related to the cases. This is of course PRIOR to their willingness to rule on the cases via private Conference.
Was I suprised by this legal manuvor to attempt to prevent the Justices from having to rule on the cases?
NO!
Again, my initial three U.S. Supreme Court cases were filed back in 2012. The powers that be have been trying to prevent a ruling on the cases for years, although the cases will positively impact the lives of millions of citizens nationwide for generations to come.
Here is a link to their Order and / or Decision to request MORE MONEY ( http://bit.ly/1l1ITMl - representing the State of North Carolina and U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 15-6567 http://bit.ly/1ZYBTjk
- representing the State of Georgia) to pay for their "services" on only TWO of the nine Spence Cases.
Presumably, I will have the same expenses related to the other seven cases that are set to be Joined with the existing two U.S. Supreme Court Cases and / or connected via Response shortly.
Additionally, I have mounting research expenses, PACER Expenses (U.S. Supreme Court Electronic Filing System), endless preparation, printing and mailing expenses for (again) all nine cases, including the Briefs and Response Briefs, etc. that must be filed prior to the U.S. Supreme Court Justices next private Conference.
Please note that The U.S. Supreme Court Justices have given me until Monday, February 1, 2016 to come up with all the money required to pay for their “services” OR THEY WILL DISMISS THE CASES.
Please take a moment to help by donating today!
Again, no amount of money is too small. Pennies add up to dollars. Thank you sincerely for your help!!!
My family and I have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars over the last seven years to ensure that the cases reach the U.S. Supreme Court. Unfortunately, I have been blackballed from seeking meaningful employment commiserate to my pay grade and level of expertise... since I began seeking justice non-violently via these cases. Instead, I have work several low paying jobs that unfortunately cannot keep up with the financial demands of arguing nine cases before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Please help! Make your donation today!!!
Again, no amount of money is too small. Pennies add up to dollars. Your donation is greatly appreciated!!!
Oh and be sure to share my GoFundMe Page with your friends and family so that they can read all about my story and choose to help as well.
So if you are wondering what's in it for me, it's Simple...
The rightful return of my son Spencer and new policies and laws pertaining to Public Servant Accountability, Judicial Reform, Mass Incarceration, States Rights to Govern as it Pleases, the Best Interest of a Child, etc.
Oh- uhm what's in it for you... it's simple!!!
Did I mention new policies and laws pertaining to Public Servant Accountability, Judicial Reform, Mass Incarceration, States Rights to Govern as it Pleases, the Best Interest of a Child, etc.?
Yep... again, supporting me and / or essentially the Spence U.S. Supreme Court Cases will help YOU, your loved ones and millions of other citizens obtain new national policy changes and laws designed to change the trajectory of this nation and ultimately provide ALL citizens with access to their inalienable Constitutional Rights, LIFE, LIBERTY, FREEDOM, EQUALITY and JUSTICE for all!!!
For more information about the cases, read more at www.WhatsBest4Spencer.com or https://www.facebook.com/kimberly.spence.33 and be sure to sign my Petition here... http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/president-barack-obama-9?source=c.em&r_by=506764
Again, thanks in advance for your donation, help and support!!!
Kimberly
Title: Spencer's Mom
WhatsBest4Spencer.com, the approachable- 350+ Million Views- Public Persona that WORKS!
Summary… U.S. Supreme Court Windsor-Spence Case - NOs. 15-6566 and 15-6567 involve Enumerations of Error and / or Questions pertaining to the Best Interest of a Child, States’ Rights to Govern as it Pleases, Mass Incarceration, Judicial Reform and Public Servant Accountability.
Windsor- Spence Joint Case - U.S. Supreme Court Enumerations of Error and / or Questions Presented in private Conference with the U.S. Supreme Court Justices on January 8, 2016.
1. Whether the State of Georgia, North Carolina, Texas, Montana and all other States have the right to implicitly and explicitly deny citizens access to their Inalienable Constitutional Rights via State Statutory Ban’s in an effort to preserve each individual States’ Rights to Govern as it Pleases; preserve each individual States’ Jurisdiction and Long Arm Statutes; preserve each individual State’s Authority over a citizen’s right to life, liberty, freedom, justice, equality, financial security, voter rights and the pursuit of happiness; and preserve such States’ Rights to Govern as it Please above providing citizens with access to Due Process, Equal Protection and Equal Protection Against Abuse of Government Authority, under the Fourteenth Amendment; Freedom of Speech, under the First Amendment; Right to a Fair and Speedy Trial and Appeal, under the Sixth Amendment as well as access to Federal Statutes and Laws that guarantee such inalienable Constitutional Rights under 18 U.S.C. § 1503, 28 U.S.C. § 1292, 28 U.S.C. § 1655, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2), 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3), Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, “466 U.S. 147, 104 S. Ct. 1723, 80 L. Ed. 2d. 196, 52 U.S.L.W. 3751, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), Loving v. Virginia (Case No. 388 U.S. 1 (1967), Burt W. Griffin & Lewis R. Katz OH. FELONY SENT.L. § 5:53 (2008), Civil Rights Act of 1871, Civil Rights Act of 1961 and the Civil Rights Act of 1871, Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 (1957), Dean v. United States, 418 F. Supp. 149(E.D.N.Y. 2006), Frap 3., Title II. Appeal from a Judgment or Order of a District Court, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972), International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 66 S. Ct. 154, 90 L. Ed. 95 (1945), International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 66 S. Ct. 154, 90 L. Ed. 95 (1945) , Jenkins v. McKeithen, 395 U.S. 411, 421 (1959); Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 151 Fed 2nd 240; Pucket v. Cox, 456 2nd 233, Kansas v. Crane, 122 S. Ct. 867 (2002), Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), Maty v. Grasselli Chemical Co., 303 U.S. 197 (1938), Menard v. Mitchell, 430 F. 2d 486, Milner v. Department of the Navy, 90-1163, Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361, 365 (1989), Mugler V. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623 at 661, O’Connory v. Donaldson, 42 U.S. 563 (1975), Picking v. Pennsylvania Railway, 151 F. 2d. 240, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted October 15, 1970), Sealed Appellant v. Sealed Appellee, 130 F.3d 695, 697 (5th Cir.1997) Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 2d 946 (1973), Sims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925) and B. Platsky v. CIA, 953 F. 2d 25, 26 28 (2nd Cir. 1991), United States v. Andrades, 169 F.3d 131, 132 (1999), United States v. Bohr, 406 F. Supp 1218 (E.D. Wis. 1976), United States v. Doe, 935 F. Supp. 478 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) and any other statute designed to preserve inalienable Constitutional Rights.
2. Whether the State of Georgia, North Carolina, Texas, Montana and all other States have the right to continue America’s longstanding draconian tradition of Enslaving African American Descendants of Slaves and all other Human Beings via for profit State and Federal Mass Incarceration systems under the Thirteenth Amendment or provide companies with the highly profitable means to extract reduced or FREE Labor and levy exurbanite fees for inmate services against citizens and their loved ones, as such practices undermines family structures; fosters generationally impoverished communities; sanctions an American cast system based on greed and violence; and provides the irrational and irresponsible justification of retaliatory acts against citizens who seek, demand and deserve access to life, liberty, freedom, justice, equality, financial security, voter rights, the pursuit of happiness, equal protection, equal protection against government authority, freedom of speech, the right to a fair and speedy trial and appeal, access to inalienable Constitutional Rights as well as the right to access protected Federal Statutes and Laws designed to protect the rights of citizens over and above the rights of States to operate under States’ Rights to Govern as it Please. Whether draconian American “systems” like Mass Incarceration inherently targets and disproportionately affects African American Descendants of Slaves who have generationally endured for profit systems of past like Slavery, Sharecropping and Jim Crow. Whether draconian American “systems” like Mass Incarceration, who inherently target and disproportionately affect African American Descendants of Slaves, less fortunate citizens and activists, unduly deprives citizens of their right to access life, liberty, freedom, justice, equality, financial security, voter rights, the pursuit of happiness, Due Process, Equal Protection and Equal Protection Against Government Authority; under the Fourteenth Amendment, Freedom of Speech; under the First Amendment, Right to a Fair and Speedy Trial and Appeal; under the Sixth Amendment and access to Federal Statutes and Laws guaranteeing a citizens rights to inalienable Constitutional Rights.
3. Whether individuals who violate their Oath of Office or deprive citizens of their inalienable Constitutional Rights or operate under tyranny should be sanctioned via Frivolous Error Fees designed to target their current or future earned income, retirement plans and pensions, current and future investments or any financial enterprise designed to generate, accumulate or pass on wealth, stability or comfort to themselves or others in an effort to offset tax payer expenses related to settlements or restitutions resulting from their negligent, criminal or profit driven choices and actions; offset incredulous and severe expenses of historically oppressed African American Descendants of Slaves and all other citizens proven to have been denied access to their inalienable constitutional rights or deprived of life, liberty, freedom, justice, equality, financial security, voter rights or the pursuit of happiness as a result of individuals who violate their oath of office; or depriving citizens of access to their inalienable Constitutional Rights, which hinders such rights to Due Process, Equal Protection and Equal Protection Against Government Authority, under the Fourteenth Amendment; detours Freedom of Speech, under the First Amendment; precludes such Rights to a Fair and Speedy Trial and Appeal, under the Sixth Amendment and thwarts access to Federal Statutes and Laws guaranteeing inalienable Constitutional Rights.http://whatsbest4spencer.com/
____________________________________________________________
February 6, 2016
Although Kimberly has joint custody of her son Spencer, she has for the past 8 years struggled with her ex-attorney husband and the court system to see him.
The last time Kimberly saw Spencer, he was approximately 3 years old. The last time she spoke with him was on Mother's Day 2015 - 9 months ago.
Because Kimberly has not seen Spencer in approximately 3 years, as a parent-especially a mother, I cannot begin to imagine the heart wrenching pain that surely grips her heart. Not to be able to fix his boo boos, or comfort Spencer when he is sniffling with a cold, not to hold him close to her bosom and kiss him on the cheek or forehead to make everything ok. Not being able to share in all the joys of being a mother has been devastating and emotionally draining.
Not to mention the countless missed holidays and special occasions....not being able to wish your only child a Happy Birthday, or receiving the Mother's Day Cards that the kids make in school, no Christmas wishes or waking up on Christmas Day to see the sparkle in your child's eyes as he opened his Christmas presents, no shared New Year's Days, no shared family gatherings.
Despite the emotional roller coaster, Kimberly has preserved. Of the 9 pending cases she has with the U.S. Supreme Court, two of them have been accepted and reviewed by the Justices. What that means is that the U.S. Supreme Court only accepts cases where there have been violations of Constitutional rights AND of the 16,000 cases received per year by the court, only 8,000 of them are docketed. Finally, only 1 percent of the cases are heard by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices. Kimberly's cases made the 1%.
This whole process has been financially draining. Kimberly has no money; however, she still has a mortgage payment, car note, health insurance payments, and printing/postage expenses.
Won't you support Kimberly's efforts in helping to not only reunite her with her son Spencer but to also change the laws so that NO one else has to endure what she has experienced in these last 9 years.
Please show your support with your donation of any amount by going to the following link.
For details about the cases, please visit WhatsBest4Spencer.com, https://www.facebook.com/kimberly.spence.33, http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/president-barack-obama-9?source=c.em&r_by=506764 or gofund.me/vzen8e8s
Thank you for your support.
Spencer's Grandma
Sheila Spence
____________________________________________________________
Please copy and paste the below message and send it out to all of your contacts. Thanks!
Beginning of February 6, 2016 message…
____________________________________________________________
Hello Everyone!!!
The days leading up to the U.S. Supreme Court Deadline to come up with the Docketing and Printing Fees for Case NO 15-6566 (Representing the State of North Carolina) and 15-6567 (Representing the State of Georgia) were pretty thrilling to put it mildly.
On Thursday, January 28th, I received an after-hours follow-up call from Jeff Atkins (THANK YOU!) who oversees Michael Duggan (THANK YOU!), the primary Clerks assigned to process my case information and received FABULOUS news!!!
The first of my four emergency filings (2 Motions and 2 Applications were filed) were granted by Chief Justice John Roberts (THANK YOU, THANK YOU SINCERELY!!!).
Days later on February 1, 2016, I spoke with Jeff Atkins again (Thank You) and he advised that Republican Justice Clarence Thomas followed Chief Justice John Roberts lead and granted my second of two emergency filings.
The granting of my two Applications to Extend time for payment of docketing fees and printing costs for Case NO 15-6566 (North Carolina) and Case NO 15-6567 (Georgia), provide the court enough time to re-consider separate Motions to reconsider In Forma Pauperis status on both cases.
*Motions on In Forma Pauperis determine a citizen’s ability to skip having to pay for Court fees and the cost of printing each case filing 40 TIMES. Who knows why and for what reason each case filing or item needs to be printed 40 times. I don’t know why there is a need and certainly don’t understand the rationale in this day and age of technology, wherein all documents are scanned in electronically via PACER (our tax payer funded- public information – case viewing/ research site that all citizens have to pay to use in order to access relevant information related to cases.). I also don’t understand the rational of allowing Attorney’s the ability to file their court documents electronically (without the same exorbitant costs) via the tax payer funded system (PACER), but not allowing Pro Se (non- Attorney’s) citizens the same right to access the same system that they are paying for via their hard earned tax payer dollars. Yes, this is also another example of an Error listed in the cases. LOL, back to my main point.
The granting of the Application to Extend Time pushes back the deadline to pay for immediate costs associated with the North Carolina (Case NO. 15-6566) and Georgia (Case NO 15-6567) Cases from February 1, 2016 to April 1, 2016!!!
This is super- fabulous news for not only William Windsor, Spencer and I… but super-duper fabulous news for all citizens!!! The relevant cases pertaining to providing ALL citizens with access to their inalienable constitutional rights are just that much closer than they were a month… a year… two years… a decade and even several decades ago. The glass is half full!!!
But that’s NOT ALL!!!
On February 3, 2016, I received notice that the U.S. Supreme Court Justices will meet on February 19, 2016 in private Conference to hear and rule on my final two emergency Motions. They pertain to my right to have and continue proceeding with the cases with In Forma Pauperis status.
Click on the below links to see a screenshot of the U.S. Supreme Courts latest notice...
Case NO 15-6566 - http://bit.ly/20O7zIo
Case NO - 15-6567 - http://bit.ly/1Qk3yEf
This is HUGE!!! If my Motion to reconsider GRANTING In Forma Pauperis status is Denied, the immediate costs will include a…
1. $300.00 docketing fee
2. approximately $500.00 for custom booklets (printed 40 time as required by the rules of the U.S. Supreme Court ) and
3. approximately $150.00 for the certified postage
The Total cost for each of the two cases will be approximately $950.00 and this DOES NOT include the cost of printing the Briefs for each of the cases 40 times in custom booklet form; printing the Response Briefs 40 times in custom booklet form for each of the other seven Spence cases; filing any other additional motions 40 times in custom booklet form; shipping the documents back and forth to the U.S. Supreme Court via certified mail; my time and an assistants time away from work to prepare the documents for submission to the U.S. Supreme Court; associated costs related to travel (Hotel, Transportation, Meals, etc.) to and from DC in the event that Oral Arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court are granted, etc. or my time away from work to continue this successful create awareness campaign with Insiders and the General Public.
Again, the U.S. Supreme Court Justices ruling on In Forma Pauperis status will be HUGE!!! February 19, 2016 is fast approaching and we still yet have work to do!!! Please continue shifting your gifts, time, talent, finances, vision, etc… no matter your political affiliation, race, class, gender, creed or sexual orientation to ensure that the Windsor-Spence cases are rightfully heard and ruled on by the U.S. Supreme Court. William Windsor and I have done all that we can do to ensure the success of the case. NOW it’s up to you!!!
On that note, I would sincerely like to THANK ALL TEAMS, Insiders and Supporters for creating the type of awareness that warranted such a swift- positive response from the U.S. Supreme Court over these last critical few weeks!!! YOU ROCK!!!
Please continue your hard work and encourage other Insiders, Supporters and likeminded “We the People citizens to continuing shifting the use of their gifts, time, talents, finances, vision, etc. away from Political “Leaders”, Political Parties and elections and TOWARDS using their gifts, time, talent, finances, vision, etc…. to help create THE better America that we all desire and envision… right NOW… AND for the future of our children, our children’s children and this nation!
Thank you sincerely and keep up the great work!!!
Kimberly
Title: Spencer's Mom
WhatsBest4Spencer.com, the approachable- 350+ Million Views- Public Persona that WORKS!
Summary… U.S. Supreme Court Windsor-Spence Case - NOs. 15-6566 and 15-6567 involve Enumerations of Error and / or Questions pertaining to the Best Interest of a Child, States’ Rights to Govern as it Pleases, Mass Incarceration, Judicial Reform and Public Servant Accountability. You may find quick updates about the cases here… https://www.facebook.com/kimberly.spence.33 here… http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/president-barack-obama-9?source=c.em&r_by=506764 or here… gofund.me/vzen8e8s
_________________________________________________________
End of Message
Initial GoFundMe Message...
____________________________________________________________
Hi!
My name is Kimberly Spence, mother to soon to be eight year old Spencer. Like you, I want to protect the best interest of children and families.
That's why I currently have cases pending before the Supreme Court of the United States regarding not only my right to see Spencer, but involving Public Servant Accountability, Judicial Reform, Mass Incarceration, States Rights to Govern as it Pleases, the Best Interest of a Child and a whole host of other key policy issues designed to transform this nation into a better America RIGHT NOW… for ourselves... for the future of our children and for the future of this nation.
The U.S. Supreme Court Justices met in PRIVATE conference on January 8, 2016 to determine new national laws based on only two of my nine Pro Se Cases. Case No. 15-6566 ( http://bit.ly/1l1ITMl - representing the State of North Carolina) and U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 15-6567 (http://bit.ly/1ZYBTjk - representing the State of Georgia) were properly Joined December 3, 2015.
It should be noted that my initial three U.S. Supreme Court cases were filled in 2012 (four years ago) and I have been in and out of court “systems” in two separate States for more than seven long years in an attempt to access my inalienable Constitutional Rights, seek justice and ensure the proper return of my son Spencer.
I have not been allowed to legally (Due to a fraudulent Judicial Order that left me with Joint Custody, but an inability to physically see Spencer. My ex-husband is an Attorney who willfully and erroneously manipulated the “system” .) see Spencer since May 21, 2013 or physically see Spencer in 2 ½ years. Additionally, I have not been allowed to speak with Spencer since May of 2015 (Mother's Day).
Finally, on August 30, 2013, President Obama and then Attorney General Eric Holder (via a U.S. Department of Justice Response to my 22nd Federal Complaint) stated that they didn't want the "Responsibility of Enforcing" the Constitution. http://bit.ly/1GFSaE5
However, just in case they were joking (hee-hee-hee), I filed the 25th+ (I stopped counting after 25) Federal Complaint with our new Attorney General, Loretta Lynch (Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc.).
Oh and just in case they weren’t lying, I have good news!
ALL politicians and / or tax payer funded public servants report to... We the People!!!
AND... that’s where you come in!!!
I really- really- really need your help.
Will you take a moment to donate $10.00…
or how about $5.00…
heck, how about a dollar!!!
LOL... I’ll take a $1.00.
Believe me, no amount is too large or too small to help offset the cost of mounting expenses related to ensuring that America's historic Windsor-Spence cases are finally filed, date stamped, docketed, joined, heard and ruled on via Conference by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices.
So here's an update on the nine Spence cases...
The U.S. Supreme Court issued an Orderin January 11, 2016 requiring that I PAY for ADDITIONAL Expenses related to the cases. This is of course PRIOR to their willingness to rule on the cases via private Conference.
Was I suprised by this legal manuvor to attempt to prevent the Justices from having to rule on the cases?
NO!
Again, my initial three U.S. Supreme Court cases were filed back in 2012. The powers that be have been trying to prevent a ruling on the cases for years, although the cases will positively impact the lives of millions of citizens nationwide for generations to come.
Here is a link to their Order and / or Decision to request MORE MONEY ( http://bit.ly/1l1ITMl - representing the State of North Carolina and U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 15-6567 http://bit.ly/1ZYBTjk
- representing the State of Georgia) to pay for their "services" on only TWO of the nine Spence Cases.
Presumably, I will have the same expenses related to the other seven cases that are set to be Joined with the existing two U.S. Supreme Court Cases and / or connected via Response shortly.
Additionally, I have mounting research expenses, PACER Expenses (U.S. Supreme Court Electronic Filing System), endless preparation, printing and mailing expenses for (again) all nine cases, including the Briefs and Response Briefs, etc. that must be filed prior to the U.S. Supreme Court Justices next private Conference.
Please note that The U.S. Supreme Court Justices have given me until Monday, February 1, 2016 to come up with all the money required to pay for their “services” OR THEY WILL DISMISS THE CASES.
Please take a moment to help by donating today!
Again, no amount of money is too small. Pennies add up to dollars. Thank you sincerely for your help!!!
My family and I have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars over the last seven years to ensure that the cases reach the U.S. Supreme Court. Unfortunately, I have been blackballed from seeking meaningful employment commiserate to my pay grade and level of expertise... since I began seeking justice non-violently via these cases. Instead, I have work several low paying jobs that unfortunately cannot keep up with the financial demands of arguing nine cases before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Please help! Make your donation today!!!
Again, no amount of money is too small. Pennies add up to dollars. Your donation is greatly appreciated!!!
Oh and be sure to share my GoFundMe Page with your friends and family so that they can read all about my story and choose to help as well.
So if you are wondering what's in it for me, it's Simple...
The rightful return of my son Spencer and new policies and laws pertaining to Public Servant Accountability, Judicial Reform, Mass Incarceration, States Rights to Govern as it Pleases, the Best Interest of a Child, etc.
Oh- uhm what's in it for you... it's simple!!!
Did I mention new policies and laws pertaining to Public Servant Accountability, Judicial Reform, Mass Incarceration, States Rights to Govern as it Pleases, the Best Interest of a Child, etc.?
Yep... again, supporting me and / or essentially the Spence U.S. Supreme Court Cases will help YOU, your loved ones and millions of other citizens obtain new national policy changes and laws designed to change the trajectory of this nation and ultimately provide ALL citizens with access to their inalienable Constitutional Rights, LIFE, LIBERTY, FREEDOM, EQUALITY and JUSTICE for all!!!
For more information about the cases, read more at www.WhatsBest4Spencer.com or https://www.facebook.com/kimberly.spence.33 and be sure to sign my Petition here... http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/president-barack-obama-9?source=c.em&r_by=506764
Again, thanks in advance for your donation, help and support!!!
Kimberly
Title: Spencer's Mom
WhatsBest4Spencer.com, the approachable- 350+ Million Views- Public Persona that WORKS!
Summary… U.S. Supreme Court Windsor-Spence Case - NOs. 15-6566 and 15-6567 involve Enumerations of Error and / or Questions pertaining to the Best Interest of a Child, States’ Rights to Govern as it Pleases, Mass Incarceration, Judicial Reform and Public Servant Accountability.
Windsor- Spence Joint Case - U.S. Supreme Court Enumerations of Error and / or Questions Presented in private Conference with the U.S. Supreme Court Justices on January 8, 2016.
1. Whether the State of Georgia, North Carolina, Texas, Montana and all other States have the right to implicitly and explicitly deny citizens access to their Inalienable Constitutional Rights via State Statutory Ban’s in an effort to preserve each individual States’ Rights to Govern as it Pleases; preserve each individual States’ Jurisdiction and Long Arm Statutes; preserve each individual State’s Authority over a citizen’s right to life, liberty, freedom, justice, equality, financial security, voter rights and the pursuit of happiness; and preserve such States’ Rights to Govern as it Please above providing citizens with access to Due Process, Equal Protection and Equal Protection Against Abuse of Government Authority, under the Fourteenth Amendment; Freedom of Speech, under the First Amendment; Right to a Fair and Speedy Trial and Appeal, under the Sixth Amendment as well as access to Federal Statutes and Laws that guarantee such inalienable Constitutional Rights under 18 U.S.C. § 1503, 28 U.S.C. § 1292, 28 U.S.C. § 1655, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2), 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3), Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, “466 U.S. 147, 104 S. Ct. 1723, 80 L. Ed. 2d. 196, 52 U.S.L.W. 3751, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), Loving v. Virginia (Case No. 388 U.S. 1 (1967), Burt W. Griffin & Lewis R. Katz OH. FELONY SENT.L. § 5:53 (2008), Civil Rights Act of 1871, Civil Rights Act of 1961 and the Civil Rights Act of 1871, Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 (1957), Dean v. United States, 418 F. Supp. 149(E.D.N.Y. 2006), Frap 3., Title II. Appeal from a Judgment or Order of a District Court, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972), International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 66 S. Ct. 154, 90 L. Ed. 95 (1945), International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 66 S. Ct. 154, 90 L. Ed. 95 (1945) , Jenkins v. McKeithen, 395 U.S. 411, 421 (1959); Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 151 Fed 2nd 240; Pucket v. Cox, 456 2nd 233, Kansas v. Crane, 122 S. Ct. 867 (2002), Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), Maty v. Grasselli Chemical Co., 303 U.S. 197 (1938), Menard v. Mitchell, 430 F. 2d 486, Milner v. Department of the Navy, 90-1163, Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361, 365 (1989), Mugler V. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623 at 661, O’Connory v. Donaldson, 42 U.S. 563 (1975), Picking v. Pennsylvania Railway, 151 F. 2d. 240, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted October 15, 1970), Sealed Appellant v. Sealed Appellee, 130 F.3d 695, 697 (5th Cir.1997) Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 2d 946 (1973), Sims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925) and B. Platsky v. CIA, 953 F. 2d 25, 26 28 (2nd Cir. 1991), United States v. Andrades, 169 F.3d 131, 132 (1999), United States v. Bohr, 406 F. Supp 1218 (E.D. Wis. 1976), United States v. Doe, 935 F. Supp. 478 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) and any other statute designed to preserve inalienable Constitutional Rights.
2. Whether the State of Georgia, North Carolina, Texas, Montana and all other States have the right to continue America’s longstanding draconian tradition of Enslaving African American Descendants of Slaves and all other Human Beings via for profit State and Federal Mass Incarceration systems under the Thirteenth Amendment or provide companies with the highly profitable means to extract reduced or FREE Labor and levy exurbanite fees for inmate services against citizens and their loved ones, as such practices undermines family structures; fosters generationally impoverished communities; sanctions an American cast system based on greed and violence; and provides the irrational and irresponsible justification of retaliatory acts against citizens who seek, demand and deserve access to life, liberty, freedom, justice, equality, financial security, voter rights, the pursuit of happiness, equal protection, equal protection against government authority, freedom of speech, the right to a fair and speedy trial and appeal, access to inalienable Constitutional Rights as well as the right to access protected Federal Statutes and Laws designed to protect the rights of citizens over and above the rights of States to operate under States’ Rights to Govern as it Please. Whether draconian American “systems” like Mass Incarceration inherently targets and disproportionately affects African American Descendants of Slaves who have generationally endured for profit systems of past like Slavery, Sharecropping and Jim Crow. Whether draconian American “systems” like Mass Incarceration, who inherently target and disproportionately affect African American Descendants of Slaves, less fortunate citizens and activists, unduly deprives citizens of their right to access life, liberty, freedom, justice, equality, financial security, voter rights, the pursuit of happiness, Due Process, Equal Protection and Equal Protection Against Government Authority; under the Fourteenth Amendment, Freedom of Speech; under the First Amendment, Right to a Fair and Speedy Trial and Appeal; under the Sixth Amendment and access to Federal Statutes and Laws guaranteeing a citizens rights to inalienable Constitutional Rights.
3. Whether individuals who violate their Oath of Office or deprive citizens of their inalienable Constitutional Rights or operate under tyranny should be sanctioned via Frivolous Error Fees designed to target their current or future earned income, retirement plans and pensions, current and future investments or any financial enterprise designed to generate, accumulate or pass on wealth, stability or comfort to themselves or others in an effort to offset tax payer expenses related to settlements or restitutions resulting from their negligent, criminal or profit driven choices and actions; offset incredulous and severe expenses of historically oppressed African American Descendants of Slaves and all other citizens proven to have been denied access to their inalienable constitutional rights or deprived of life, liberty, freedom, justice, equality, financial security, voter rights or the pursuit of happiness as a result of individuals who violate their oath of office; or depriving citizens of access to their inalienable Constitutional Rights, which hinders such rights to Due Process, Equal Protection and Equal Protection Against Government Authority, under the Fourteenth Amendment; detours Freedom of Speech, under the First Amendment; precludes such Rights to a Fair and Speedy Trial and Appeal, under the Sixth Amendment and thwarts access to Federal Statutes and Laws guaranteeing inalienable Constitutional Rights.http://whatsbest4spencer.com/
Organizer
Kimberly Spence
Organizer
Atlanta, GA
