SB277 Lawsuit Fund
Our lawsuit, which has 6 plaintiffs, can be read here: www.RevoltRevokeRestore.com
If we win - we win for everyone in striking down the law!
We seek volunteers such as yourself, who can fundraise in your community to fund this lawsuit. ALL children in California deserve an education. This movement will be successful with YOUR help! Rally your community to fight against overreaching government. Find out how you can help at our website: www.RevoltRevokeRestore.com.
Here are a few great articles regarding our efforts:
On Oct. 20th our judge dismissed our case without chance for a hearing. It's our belief we will win on appeal We are seeking an additional $15,000 to appeal.
Note that there are ethical considerations for any attorney using funds raised from third parties. Such a firm’s fiduciary duty must only run to the client(s), if any, that it would represent to challenge SB277 and such representation cannot be influenced by third parties. Hence, if sufficient funds are raised and hence not refunded, they shall be an irrevocable gift that does not entitle the gifter to any rights, legal representation, or influence, in any manner whatsoever, related in the representation of any client(s) of any firm using these funds. The only client to whom such firm will owe a fiduciary duty, whose direction it will follow, and whose interests it is fiduciary bound to protect will be the actual plaintiffs on whose behalf the firm may seek to challenge SB277. Such are the ethical restrictions that any such law firm must abide. Note there are no refunds being offered under any circumstances.
For those of you that pray, please COPY this text and SHARE with those you know are truly for SB277 being overturned! This is an extremely important case because it's a precedent-setting law, meaning, it's the gateway to the rest of the states following suit, and many already are. Many people may not be sure which side of the debate their on. My encouragement is to not get hung up on which side of the debate people are on regarding their personal beliefs either for or against vaccines, but recognizing the importance of parental opt-outs being restored, religious freedom being restored and putting the care of our children back in the hands of the parents. None of us can afford to leave the decision making power of healthcare in the hands of the government.
These are the following prayer points I would ask people to agree with. Take this to your prayer partners. We need all the help we can get before the court date on June 28th!
* Pray for the new attorney arguing this case (James Long), that he will be well prepared for anything the State's legal defense may use in their oral arguments. Grant him the ability to formulate and implement excellent strategy against all adversaries and enemies. Help them to be unpredictable to the lawyers and legal counsel representing the State of California. God, we ask You to send out the weapons out of your armory that will create fear and confusion in the enemy camp and eliminate the State’s ability to create a strong defense.
*Pray for James and Nathan (James will more likely be the one to argue the case) to be clear on the case law, especially those used out of context as in Jacobson vs the State of Massachusetts.
* Pray that this lawsuit would not be contaminated by introducing a fraudulent lawsuit known as WHITLOW, which was a pro-vaccination lawsuit brought about by crooked lawyers. Pray that this would not be introduced or allowed to be brought up as it could bring prejudice to the judge hearing the case.
* Pray that our judges are not bribed, intimidated nor biased in favor of supporting vaccination laws and they would rule favorably on behalf of the plaintiffs.
* Pray that NO STATE may be able to mandate products known to cause cancer or other serious health-related issues. One of the ingredients in vaccines is glyphosate, which is the active ingredient in Roundup, the world's most popular weed killer. The Attorney General's office won their case against Monsanto which manufacturers Roundup, stating that they had to have a label declaring that glyphosate causes cancer on their product - YET, they want to declare vaccines are safe and effective, even though this same ingredient is in vaccines. One of the main points that will be brought up is that the state cannot mandate products known to cause cancer, death or injury.
* Pray that the Attorney General cannot prove a compelling, convincing governmental interest in 'total immunization.'
* Pray that the theory that all official agencies support vaccines (The CDC, the HHS, WHO) would NOT be an influencing factor in this case and that any evidence introduced to support this view would be ignored by the judged.
*Pray for the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Bruesewitz vs. Wyeth (2011) which declared all vaccines are unavoidably unsafe will prevail in convincing the judge to overturn SB277 AND making the stipulation that NO STATE can mandate products proven to be unsafe.
*Pray that the Attorney General's team would not be able to successfully and convincingly argue their case, and that their case would fail to convince the judge of their legal arguments.
* Pray that the Attorney General's legal team cannot prove that SB277 is narrowly tailored to effectuate their argument for total immunization.
*Pray that the Attorney General's team cannot demonstrate there exists no "less restrictive alternatives to SB277."
*Pray that SB277 would be struck down for its vagueness; it does not apply to everyone equally (discrimination).
* Pray that SB277 would be struck down because it violates freedom of religion, the right to education, lack of informed consent, and violates parental rights (removing them in regards to decision-making process over their child's healthcare) without due process of law.
Some scripture references to declare:
*Declare Luke 21:15 over Attorneys James and Nathan (no last names given due to possible harassment ) that God has given them a mouth filled with wisdom that their adversaries cannot contradict nor refute.
* Declare "God, you frustrate the devices of the crafty so that their hands cannot carry out their plans. You catch the wise in their own craftiness and the counsel of the cunning comes quickly upon them according to Job 5:12,13."
* "Blessed be the LORD who delivered us from the hand of the Egyptians and from the hands of political pharaohs, and who delivered the people from under the hand of the Egyptians. Now I know that the LORD is greater than all gods: for in the thing wherein they dealt proudly He was above them." Exodus 18:11
* Your promise in Isaiah 1:26 is that You would give us good judges and wise counselors again. Please give us our liberty back, in Jesus name!
* I declare a sword of justice is against the mighty that seek to perpetuate evil plans and conspire against our children. Father, it is written in Isaiah 49:25 where You affirmed that “captives would be taken from warriors and plunder retrieved from the fierce; You said that You would contend with those that contend with us, and our children You would save.” Father God, we bless you and THANK YOU for pleading our cause in the court of law. We declare Jesus Christ is our advocate and attorney, going to court with us and for us. We declare the name of JESUS CHRIST over SB277, the Attorney General, the State of California and command they bow to the name of Jesus our Lord. Thank You for victory in Jesus name. Amen.
We argue that #SB277 is unlawful, principally, for two reasons:
(1) no state may mandate products known to be "unavoidably unsafe," [and the Supreme Court declares all vaccines are "unavoidably unsafe" in Bruesewitz vs. Wyeth, (2011)]; and, (2) no bona fide "medical necessity" justifies #SB277, [as required by Jacobson vs. Mass., (1905)], because (a) the Disneyland Measle Event was a minor event (not deadly), and thus, the state cannot show an "actual necessity" sufficient to justify the vaccine mandate, and (b) the Measle Event already fizzled itself out, which means that, even if there were an actual necessity back in 2016, there is no longer a "present-time necessity" to justify the vaccine mandate -- and as a result, there exists no legal justification to support Sacramento's suspension of constitutional rights. SB277 is plainly unconstitutional.
Our arguments are legally sound. I do believe they will carry the day. If anyone has more convincing arguments, please do tell us in the comments section. If you'd like to participate in shaping California law, please tell us why #SB277 is unlawful.
Our arguments on appeal will define the scope and breadth of California law, and so too, the nation. If we lose, prepare for an avalanche of medical mandates and more intrusions into civil liberties (and a downward spiral from children's holocaust to global slavery, to world-wide, vaccine-induced genocide -- with 90% of the world's children put to the sword in the name of depopulation!).
The time to resist is now. Join us!! First, we strike down #SB277!!
And then we demand worldwide vaccine abolition!! Accept nothing less!!
Freedom means nothing if you can't keep the gov't out of your body!!
"Yo Soy un Abolicionista!! Viva La Revolucion!" ~~TMP.
And then, if the appellate court permits, the parties argue the issues at oral arguments, which is always exciting because of the possibility of changing the law. So too, we hope to change California law -- to strike down SB277, which violates the constitutional right to live free of forced medical procedures known to come with unavoidable risk of adverse side effects. We are the ONLY lawsuit standing. All other SB277 challengers have given up. We believe we will create case law precedent, and we intend to change the law! Tell others!! And stay tuned.~~TMP.
Also, I met with Sharon and the Triple RRR Exec. Team regarding our focus on appeal. We resolve that our appellate brief will focus on our firmly held belief that the State cannot mandate products known to come with appreciable risk (aka "unavoidably unsafe"). It seems clear that, if we merely argue "freedom of religion," "right to go to school," or "right to choice," then we are doomed on appeal. And while these arguments may have popular appeal on Facebook, they will not succeed in court -- so we urge you all to stop waving the flag of medical freedom -- and instead focus on the fact that all vaccines are known to be unsafe!!!
My office and Triple RRR pose the greatest alarm to the vaccine establishment (and our fan mail/hate mail proves it). Why is this?--because we oppose vaccines based on SAFETY reasons. For us, it is NOT a matter of right to choose, or not choose, vaccines." When it comes to vaccines, we would never consider allowing others to choose -- because we have actual knowledge that all vaccines are unsafe!! We urge everyone to move beyond the stale-dated arguments, ("freedom of religion," "right to go to school," "right to choice,"), and instead focus on the precise issue: the State cannot mandate products known to be unsafe!!
Mandatory seat belt laws?--sure, that's reasonable. Mandatory helmet laws for motorcycle riders?--okay, we get it. But mandatory medical procedures -- which necessarily come with tangible risk of great bodily harm? NO WAY!!
Please stay tuned.~~TMP.
Don't bother with this .. it's a scam. It's being spread around facebook by a very immature and childish individual who is attacking other users, using abusive and threatening language and harming the cause. I wouldn't be putting my name to this one, as it's all going to reflect very badly on anyone supporting it.
Are there any updates for this campaign?