In central London, England, the County Court and the High Court are two different courts. They are both found inside the famous Royal Courts of Justice in the Strand .The County Court is the Small Claims Court. The High Court takes very serious cases and can prevent unlawful, abusive, intimidating and menacing behaviour by agents of the press and media.
I am raising funds for legal fees in respect of a high profile, sure win High Court case against the rogue London journalist Piers Morgan and his London based press and media associates.
I am taking Piers Morgan to the High Court at Central London to stop his cruel campaign to remove government funding of vital court fees for the innocent on low incomes in Britain.
At the same time, I am taking Piers Morgan to court for his Defamation, Libel, Malicious Falsehood, Abuse of Privacy and Harassment which he keeps publishing. Including publication incidences dating from the 18th February 2025 until the present time.
I’m also taking the The Sun, The Daily Mail, The Metro, The Express and The Evening Standard to the High Court alongside as other press and media publications who have continuously engaged in Defamation, Libel, Malicious Falsehood, Abuse of Privacy and Harassment.
Numerous publications are currently assisting Piers Morgan in his campaign to remove government funded legal and court assistance from the innocent on low incomes.
Unethical agents of the press and media who abuse their positions do individuals, families and communities immense harm and must be prevented for all our sakes.
Piers Morgan is known for his ‘horrific personal attacks’ on a whole variety of people he takes against. His attacks on me and my family have been horrendous to experience.
I find Piers Morgan to be a repulsive bully.
The funds being raised on this page are for lawyers fees and court fees for the hearing at the High Court and for case preparation. Even though the lawyers handling this matter will do their best to keep fees to a minimum, there is still an amount of essential funding needed.
Statements published in the press and media about me are malicious falsehood, they are entirely untrue.
Just before the 16th May 2024 I filed just two truthful and entirely justified small claims against Piers Morgan in the County Court. These are Claim number 532MC222, against Mr. Piers Morgan the person, and Claim number 532MC234 against Mr. Piers Morgan’s company Insider Productions Ltd. These two small claims (for no more than 10k) were lawfully issued by the Court on the 16th May 2024 and delivered to Mr. Piers Morgan by the Court. I have filed no other claim against Mr. Piers Morgan since. Claim number 532MC222 is ongoing in the County Court and Claim number 532MC234 I discontinued on the basis that I could not attend court on medical grounds (due to a stay at Accident and Emergency Hospital) and due to being advised that my case would best be heard at the High Court and should be taken there.
In his press and media outlets Mr. Piers Morgan continually makes unsubtly coded references to his constant frauds against my family and me and our family photograph record and to his distorted, fraudulent version of my copyright creative work which he is constantly threatening to publish for his own profit.
Mr. Piers Morgan is in constant breach of British laws against fraud, theft, copyright abuse, harassment and stalking.
No Judge has ever ordered me to pay damages to Piers Morgan.
In respect of Piers Morgan’s allegations and assertions which he has published in the press.
I have simply not filed 64 claims against celebrities. This is an absurd malicious statement on Piers Morgan’s part.
I have never contacted Piers Morgan in any way, shape or form. I have never sent him a letter, never sent him an email, never commented on his social media pages. I have never telephoned him. I have never met him in person or been anywhere he is at, having no cause to be there and having expressly avoided him.
Piers Morgan has never made a formal complaint against me because he knows it would fail. He has gone to the press and media with defamatory, outright lies.
Piers Morgan’s widely published comparison between me and the infamous ‘Baby Reindeer stalker’ of the 2024 Netflix film ‘Baby Reindeer’ is thoroughly malicious and entirely fantastical.
I have never been considered a vexatious litigant or prevented from filing in the courts.
I am far from being Piers Morgan’s only victim. He has a long history of involvement with fraud, falsification, libel and slander, harassment, hacking and stalking .
According to British High Court judges Piers Morgan has supervised the hacking of people’s phones and bullied them; they say he is a very dishonest man.
I believe that Piers Morgan has also hacked my phones extensively in the past.
My Particulars of Claim against Piers Morgan’s company Insider Productions, Claim 532MC234. (Claim 532MC222 is still ongoing at the County Court) are coherent and reasonable and not phrased as reported in the press and media.
Detail from my court claims:
’Mr Piers Morgan has been a ringleader participant in a campaign of abuse, harassment, fraud and dishonesty directed at myself, my creative work, my family and my family history. The fraud and dishonesty involves various forms of fraud, including identity theft fraud.’
’I describe Mr. Piers Morgan as being frenetically obsessed with his campaign of fraud, dishonesty, harassment, stalking and intimidation which has nothing whatsoever to do with journalistic duty.’
‘Mr. Piers Morgan has a history of fraud.’
‘Mr. Piers Morgan regularly engages in a campaign of fraud in respect of the identity of people featuring in my parents’ authentic photograph albums. Copies of the original photographs were stolen from my home by convicted criminals in 2007.’
’Mr. Piers Morgan persistently engages in unwanted contact and in highly vindictive behaviour towards me. As well as engaging in aggressive forms of overt abuse. Some of these forms of his abuse involve his foul, fetishistic obsessions.’ (The Claim forms and other documents in the cases go into evidenced detail about the allegations including the allegations about Piers Morgan’s and others’ foul fetishistic obsessions.)
’This campaign of his {Mr. Piers Morgan} is part of his obsession with fraudulently promoting himself as a lost aristocrat, apparently in order to compensate for his humiliations on the world stage after his campaign of stalking and harassment of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.’
Attached here, my Notice of Discontinuance in respect of Claim 532MC234 in the County Court. Also, the January 14th County Court Judgement in respect of Claim 532MC234 in the County Court, in which the Judge accepts the Notice of Discontinuance I filed on the 13th January 2025. Piers Morgan’s wish (expressed via his barrister) to have Claim 532MC234 struck out was not granted by the Judge. Nor did the Judge grant Piers Morgan’s request to have me called a ‘vexatious litigant’: I’m not vexatious in the slightest.
I could not attend the County Court hearing in respect of Claim 532MC234 on January 14th 2025 due to a medical emergency.
I had made an application to transfer the claim against Insider Productions to the Intellectual Property department of the High Court in respect of Piers Morgan’s Intellectual Property theft with abuse, and then I decided to go directly to the High Court about Piers Morgan’s abusive activity and that of others.
The facts stated in my claim forms filed against Piers Morgan and other members of the abusive London press and media cabal are the tip of the iceberg.
A atrocious bully, Piers Morgan has many times abused his female victims’ medical situations, as is the case with myself and with Meghan Markle (his famous female target about whom
he acts obsessively.)
Piers Morgan has received material stolen from my home by vindictive burglars. At no stage did he inform me that stolen material was in circulation; on the contrary, he tried to use the stolen items, covetously or maliciously.
In his malicious rampage against me in the press and media, Piers Morgan mistakenly seeks to rely on abusive press and media reporting in 2007 about what was in fact a small ‘harassment 2’ conviction which I have yet to take to the Court of Appeal.
In 2007 the London press and media behaved very abusively to me, spreading reams of malicious falsehood.
The ‘harassment 2’ conviction of 2007 was spent (expired) almost two decades ago and is completely irrelevant to the present time, treated by all the courts as though it had never happened. For the purposes of the funded case this is important.
Thankyou ♥️
Felicity





