<div>My name is Lita Bablitz and I am fundraising to cover the legal cost of filing to preserve my right to claim for damages and compel AHS/APL/Dynalife finally give me the answers and transparency that I deserve. I am unlikely to win much financially (breasts simply aren't valued) but the legal process could help force the changes to our Health system that I have already spent over 19 months advocating and fighting for.
</div>
<div>In September 2021 I was BIOPSY diagnosed (after a distortion was discovered in a routine mammogram) with a large area of Intermediate grade DCIS in my right breast allegedly by 2 independent Dynalife Pathologists. It is important to note that Radial scars (mammogram distortions) are associated with malignancy only 10 to 40% depending on the criteria and as such require biopsy confirmation. I had no breast changes, no palpable lumps, and my follow up ultrasound was negative for anything suspicious. I was BIOPSY diagnosed and sent for a breast cancer treatment plan. In October 2021 I underwent an aggressive partial mastectomy, bilateral reconstruction, and removal of lymph nodes. I was to begin my Radiation Therapy sometime in November or December but the post-surgical pathology showed no sign of DCIS or any other malignancy. Biopsies and post-surgical tissues were sent to BC for an expert opinion which confirmed no malignancy or atypia was present in any of my biopsied or resected tissues. My surgeon and I were both shocked.
</div>
<div>Since then I have been trying to get answers. Even when making FOIP requests the supposed 2nd read of my biopsy does not show up. I have never been shown one bit of evidence that it was done, and no proof it matched the 1st read as required (all new malignancy requires 2 pathologists to confirm). They insist all protocols were followed and there was no system error but won't share how they know. They insist the error was "understandable" because many benign breast cells can mimic DCIS and vice versa and that this is a "known challenge in breast pathology" but they defend their choice not to provide expert oversight before treatment because the redundancy of 2 general pathologists reads will catch errors and discrepancies (they claim 2 Dynalife pathologists made the exact same misdiagnosis independently through 2 separate blind reads of my biopsies). They insist that my resulting unnecessary cancer diagnosis and treatment was inconsequential because even if my biopsies had been read correctly as benign they would have wanted to do some sort of excision to be sure no cancer was lurking. My breasts are disfigured by scarring, I have "fatty tissue necrosis" in my right breast (because my body had trouble healing from the 10cmx7cmx4cm hunk of tissue removed from it), I have nerve damage, shoulder and arm pain/problems from the scar tissue on my chest, lost 2 sentinel lymph nodes, and was off work for 3 months recovering. I had to tell my family, my friends, and my workplace that I had cancer and was going to do whatever it took and then after weeks of fear and anxiety had to tell everyone it was a mistake, yet they have the nerve to say I don't get to be upset because they probably would have recommended 'some sort of surgery anyways'. They have made it very clear I am to get over this on my own, not ask hard questions, and have no right to ask that their claims be corroborated. They say they've never seen this before and that they're taking it very seriously but couldn't even be bothered to perform a Quality Assurance Review of my case.
</div>
<div>They failed to provide adequate mental health support in the wake of my misdiagnosis, and they failed to provide timely access to physiotherapy for my shoulder and arm issues (despite telling them for months), but when I say they need to improve how they will handle misdiagnosed patients in the future they claim "lessons have been learned" yet have shown no concrete plan for change. Most importantly, when I ask how they plan to ensure this doesn't happen again they say changes are being made but it will take time; our system needs to be held accountable for its inability to act quickly when a risk to patient safety is exposed. They have spent 19 months ineffectually moving me through their silos. They say they've given me answers but they choose to ignore many of my questions and never show evidence/proof/documentation to support the answers they do give.
</div>
<div>They say I have to seek many of the outstanding answers myself from Dynalife but Dynalife says they don't have to answer to me unless legally compelled. When I seek help from provincial advocates and watchdogs (government) they say they don't have jurisdiction over private providers like Dynalife which is incredibly worrisome. But AHS/APL/CPSA also won't clearly state that they decided to dismiss my concerns without being able to scrutinize my case properly because they didn't have the supposed second read either (or do and are withholding it despite FOIP/HIA/PIPA requests) so how could they say that protocols were followed and my concerns are unfounded? To summarise, no Quality Assurance Review was performed and they claim my case represents an unfortunate, but acceptable, human error but they didn't even assess if the protocols and procedures required to make a diagnosis of breast cancer were followed. Furthermore, my case was required to be reported as an adverse outcome but there is no record of that in AHS databases (FOIP request did not produce). It appears to me (and many others) they are making the dangerous assumption that what SHOULD have been done is what WAS done and that just isn't acceptable. Policy around procedures and protocols exists to ensure patient safety and if compliance can't be scrutinized and evaluated effectively in the wake of an error then what holds them accountable? If all these checks were done then why not show me and reassure me? Afterall if cancer can be found where it isn't then it can be missed where it is, they need to be committed to honestly examining errors so the system can do it's best in the fight against cancer.
</div>
<div>So do I let my legal rights time out and give up any leverage I have to pursue these answers and hold the system responsible, for acknowledging the risks to patient safety my case has exposed, and for being accountable to make the needed changes to the system? It will cost $3000 to have a lawyer draft the documents and another few hundred to pay the filing fees and cover the Gofundme costs. I am not in a financial position to keep going alone but this will happen to others and for that reason I don't want this to be swept under the rug. If our system is worth fighting for (and I believe it is) then it's worth fixing. Change won't happen if they're not willing to practice the values they preach and I plan on reminding them of that.
</div>
<div>Thank you for considering a contribution to my fundraising effort.
</div>
<div>Lita Bablitz
</div>

Anonymous

Theresa Garvin

Ronna Filkow

Yvonne Slemko

John Crabtree

Kristy Carlyle

Marilyn Kent

Aleem Karmali

Tracy Beck

Elizabeth Macarthur

Angela Macdonald-Belanger

Jared Burton

Sue Richardson

Ai Linh Trinh

Janelle Ivey

Breast Cancer Misdiagnosis in Alberta

platform

Platform is iOS

Android

Adyen Google Pay Development Audience

$opt_dummy_attribute

English only

Deprecate Stripe Legacy

dyn_template_ids

Adyen V6 Bene Transfer & MyMoney Campaign Organizers - test01

Bene transfer V6 and AdyenV6MyMoney Campaign Organizers - production

OneTrust next-app audience

fundCountryCode

NextDoor Share Option Users

Fundraisers with Reactions feature capability

fundCurrencyCode

US + Non-charity COs Only

locale

fund country is US and user language is English

personId

comms-internal-person-ids

Enhanced Story Experience Users

Suggested Goal Experience Users

user language is English and fund country: US, AU, DK, FI, IE, NO, SE, CA, GB; 

Poster share - new funds eligible (newest 9/18)

Streaming widgets beta user

paymentProcessor

3DS payment method

user language is English and fundCountry: US, AU, DK, FI, IE, NO, SE, CA, GB; 

GoFundMe Employees

ipAddress

Mark Rieth IP Address

Version 9.2.0 and above

Fund is in English speaking country

desktop

Android v12.11.0 and above

Platform is Android

paymentMethodType

checkoutType

Payment method type group to be vaulted on success

admin pr kit prod

EUR Donation Upsell

Share Text generation Skip Fundraiser

(prod) new funds eligible for amp12 (UGC gallery)

fintrac_cad_idv_form_v2 audience

paymentProcessorAccountId

fallback mode accounts

proCampaignId

p2p legacy startfundraising page

be_supporter_comments_enabled_supported_funds

AMP24 New Funds Only PROD (DO NOT MODIFY)

countryCode

charityId

UKCharities

Federated Search Internal Testing

route.pathname community

US Donation Upsell audience 

Auto Thanks Feature Audience

Supporter Comments Eligible Funds

International Only

fundId

braze fundraiser group 

Payment Identity Transfers ATO Risk Check (Targeted) - Production

Fundraiser Saved Payment Method Rate Limit Bypass (Production)

leaderboard-partner-id-audience-givepanel

Version 9.2.1 and above

AUD Donation Upsell audience

fundraiserCountryCode is US/EN

Active Fundraiser - Smart Default Cadence

DAF Internal

Vault on success card payment method

Platform is iOS v11.0.0 and above

Desktop users

Person ids

United States (US) users

allow yuno fundraisers for test

Mexico country code

Posters INTL

NPO Profile Opted-In

iOS at or above 12.4.0

non-US recurring donors

Canada Campaign Owner Group

Fundraiser Without Meta Link

Scheduler payment tester gorup

charityCommunityId

Charities allow to be claimed unclaimed (PRD)

Canada (CA) users

currencyCode

UC Tipping v20250115 International

pymk_production_xplr_fe_team

Android at or above 12.2.0

Profile photo entry point audience

smart goals (fundraiser/manage) on test01

Activity Tracking v1 Beta Testing

writePath

Stream Notification

start gfm intl allowed locales

Platform is iOS v11.2.0 and above

prod_ach_audience

AI Chatbot Audience

amp13 only new funds (prod) (anyword auto)

UC Flow Enabled (Prod)

Payment Identity Beneficiary Verification - Production

shared notification bell audience

Custom users

ach frontend audience

Android v11.0.0 and above

Users Receiving Payments Paused Notifications

smart goals test01

Manage Coach - US English Organizers Only + new funds only

Team EGG - IP Address list

Fundraiser Without Instagram Deep Link

Native 11.4.0 and above

UC Tipping v20250107

Users Receiving Braze KYC Validation Failed

Native 11.3.0 and above

Influencer - Prod

US fundraisers and US users

userEmail

template_id

userId

fundUrl

isCharityCo

email

appVersion

shouldBucketIntoExperiment

partnerId

donationCadence

isActiveFundraiser

isPartner

isMobile

npoProfileOptIn

fundIsLinkedWithMeta

hasSessionDonation

isCampaignOwner

fundHasInstagramDeepLink

Native 11.4.0 and higher

New funds eligible - Video Sharing (PROD)

GB Donation Upsell audience 

Auto Thanks V3 Rollout Audience

Thank you V3 testing whitelist

isRecurringFriendly

Is Recurring Friendly

Excluded funds - Video Sharing

Logged In Users

CH Donation Upsell audience

Android v10.6.0 and above

userCurrencyCode

Localized Currency

v11.5.0 and above

testAudience

pathname

Survicate

appVersion is at or above 12.8.0

Non-charity fund

isChallengeFundraiser

challenge-fundraisers

Payment Identity Launch Verification - Production

New funds eligible - Posters v2

CAD Donation Upsell Audience

Braze Email Tester

NPO Profile Opted-Out

iOS App Version

hasKnownDonors

PYMK has donors

iOS v12.3.0 and above

Enter your donation forBreast Cancer Misdiagnosis in Alberta