Quick Links Please check out our <a href="https://www.covidconstitutionalchallengebc.ca" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">website</a> for the latest status updates, our FAQ, and various other resources. Summary A direct action campaign brought by the Canadian Society for the Advancement of Science in Public Policy (CSASPP) , a non-profit, non-partisan, secular, and volunteer driven organization. We intend to responsibly use your funds towards the costs of promoting, filing, and prosecuting a claim for injunctive, declaratory, or other appropriate relief in the Supreme Court of British Columbia in response to the COVID-19 measures and its constitutional implications. The proceeding is brought under the Class Proceedings Act , RSBC 1996, c 50. This means that the implications on our potential success would be shared by all citizens, as opposed to just one individual, business, or organization. We will provide the maximum financial transparency without compromising litigation privilege. The Problem As you are undoubtedly aware, British Columbians are in an unprecedented situation. The COVID-19 measures have taken their toll on businesses, individuals, and the public treasury. The measures appear to many to be incrementally draconian. An astronomically <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">low</a> infection fatality ratio (IFR); testing kits producing false positives for a <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-tanzania-idUSKBN22G295" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">goat, papaya</a> and a <a href="https://www.bitchute.com/video/OrzzUWH0s02c/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">kiwi</a>; <a href="https://bcombudsperson.ca/investigative_report/extraordinary-times-extraordinary-measures/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dubious exercise</a> of executive powers; the mysterious <a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/flu-season-2020-canada-public-health-1.5804673" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">disappearance</a> of the common seasonal flu; or an overall lack of an adequate evidential foundation is increasingly being questioned by legal scholars, private citizens, <a href="http://canlii.ca/t/jbxsm#par21" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">small business owners</a> and their patrons, physicians, nurses, the <a href="https://youtu.be/K1W0FHuR-Rc?t=30348" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">scientists selling the tests</a>, <a href="https://gbdeclaration.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">infectious disease epidemiologists and academics</a>, pharmacists, community leaders, <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylTCTcSM09Y" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">public officials</a>, <a href="https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/british-columbia/article-three-churches-defy-bc-order-to-close-to-slow-spread-of-covid-19/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">places of public worship</a>, and <a href="https://ocla.ca/ocla-letter-who/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">civil liberty advocacy groups</a>. Further, the evidence of harm as a result of these measures in <a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/public-health-annual-report-opioid-deaths-skyrocket-1.5780129" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Canada</a> and similar in the <a href="https://www.aier.org/article/cost-of-us-lockdowns-a-preliminary-report/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">United States</a> is overwhelming. Citizens have joined rallies and (mostly) peaceful protests. They share leaflets with their grievances and republish articles on social media daily. Documentary film makers have never been busier and petitions continue to grow in signatories by the hour. Have these well intentioned efforts amounted to anything? Yes, they have raised awareness. But we need to  go further.  Success is best measured when excessive COVID-19 related measures are terminated. An Independent Judiciary Are our COVID-19 related measures legal? Is every regulation, statute, or administrative directive automatically legal by virtue of having been enacted? In Medieval Europe, yes. Today, sometimes not. This is not a theoretical argument, but an <a href="https://bcombudsperson.ca/investigative_report/extraordinary-times-extraordinary-measures/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">established fact</a>. As a general rule governments, like powerful corporations, do not alter their own aberrant behaviour because it is the right thing to do. They do it because the alternative is more expensive. Not complying with a court order is expensive. Obtaining one is a powerful and practical form of non-violent use of force in a civil society our system contemplates. We live in a western liberal democracy. It is not perfect, but we have a separation of powers for the same reason a ship has multiple bulkheads to avoid the entire vessel sinking when one is ruptured. Analogously, we have an independent judiciary to safeguard us in situations exactly like the one we are in now. But unlike the executive and legislative branches of our system, the judiciary does not do anything on its own. It does not grant relief (an order) where it has not been asked to do so. Someone has to start the process. Further, that someone needs to do it in their own province since the management of health care is generally agreed to be delegated under s <a href="https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/laws/stat/30---31-vict-c-3/latest/30---31-vict-c-3.html#VI__DISTRIBUTION_OF_LEGISLATIVE_POWERS__106295" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">92(13)</a><a href="https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/laws/stat/30---31-vict-c-3/latest/30---31-vict-c-3.html#VI__DISTRIBUTION_OF_LEGISLATIVE_POWERS__106235" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> </a> of our constitution to a provincial mandate. What About Other Pressing Tangential Issues? Consider that if you are <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/16/health/covid-pfizer-vaccine-allergic-reaction.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">concerned</a> about the prospect for an eventual mandatory vaccination program for COVID-19, or the <a href="https://youtu.be/DFTsd042M3o" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">science behind vaccinations in general</a>, the executive rationalizing the measure based on its declaration of a state of emergency, that state of emergency granting extraordinary powers to the executive it otherwise would not have had, and we succeed in demonstrating to the court that there was never a reasonable justification for that state of emergency to begin with, or at least not to the extent in which it was implemented, then indirectly we have destroyed their argument - along with any other doors a state of emergency may have opened for it. This is vital for readers to understand and cannot be underscored enough. Concurrent efforts in other jurisdictions may involve other pressing tangential issues. While these might be helpful, or even entertaining to follow, any success that they may enjoy does not necessarily achieve anything for people in British Columbia for the above reason. If the first effort in British Columbia fails, it may <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Res_judicata" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">preclude</a> the ability to make a second attempt. For that reason it is actually in the best interest for the defendant that the first suit contain as many peripheral issues that weaken its probability of success. If that suit is dismissed, the law can make it difficult for someone to bring a more refined suit later with narrower issues to be tried. This is why it is essential that our <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleading" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">pleadings</a> remain focused on what the desired orders actually turn on, and not tangential issues that would be predicated on a successful constitutional challenge in any event. As tempting as it may be for those passionate about other issues to broaden the scope of what is pled, this can create <a href="http://canlii.ca/t/8lld#sec9_5" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">procedural vulnerabilities</a> that allow a defendant a much lower barrier to disposing of the claim early without the substantive issues actually being heard on their merits. That can result in the plaintiff getting hit with <a href="http://canlii.ca/t/8lld#sec14_1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">special costs</a> (fined). In that event the lawyers get paid regardless, but the client is personally stuck with the consequences. This is why some lawyers joke in the absence of a naive client that they don't lose cases, clients do. We don't want that to happen. A precise, level headed, minimum energy trajectory, free of hyperbole, aimed at an Achilles' heel, is far more sound. What Canadian Judges Already Think "The constitution of Canada does not belong either to Parliament, or to the Legislatures; it belongs to the country and it is there that the citizens of the country will find the protection of the rights to which they are entitled." – <a href="https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1950/1950canlii26/1950canlii26.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Nova Scotia (A.G.) v Canada (A.G.)</a>  [1951] S.C.R. 31. "After all, the Constitution is a document for the people and one of the most important goals of any system of dispute resolution is to serve well those who make use of it." – <a href="http://canlii.ca/t/1frcn#par28" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Reference Re Residential Tenancies Act</a>  [1996] 1 S.C.R. 186. The Solution The question of the legality of COVID-19 related measures must be put before a judge on whether they are, at the very least, <a href="https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/page-15.html#h-38" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">constitutional</a>. If they are not, then they will be struck down. This is not a theoretical concept, but is done routinely by our judicial system. This campaign intends to responsibly use your funds towards the costs of promoting, filing, and prosecuting a claim for <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Injunction" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">injunctive</a>, <a href="https://ca.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/3-509-7038" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">declaratory</a>, or other appropriate relief in the Supreme Court of British Columbia in response to the COVID-19 measures and its constitutional implications. The proceeding is currently brought under the <a href="https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/laws/stat/rsbc-1996-c-50/latest/rsbc-1996-c-50.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Class Proceedings Act</a>, RSBC 1996, c 50. This means that the implications on our potential success would be shared by all citizens, as opposed to just one individual, business, or organization. We will provide the maximum financial transparency without compromising <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_professional_privilege#Canada" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">litigation</a>. Expenses include disbursements like <a href="https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/laws/regu/bc-reg-168-2009/latest/bc-reg-168-2009.html#Schedule_1__1711074" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">filing fees</a>, fliers, couriers for <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_of_process" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">service of process</a>, photocopying, legal scholar consultants, expert witnesses, court reporters for <a href="http://canlii.ca/t/8lld#sec7_2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">examinations for discovery</a>, and so on. But the bulk of the expenses will be allocated towards the lawyers' retainer for drafting and prosecuting the claim. Too much is at stake and so the decision was made early to not cut any corners. Some of the appropriate legal talent has already been selected, their commitment identified, and some of the case law and arguments already researched. We have <a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/492237670/Notice-of-Civil-Claim" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">already filed</a>. We must ask the court to make a determination as soon as possible before our collective situation continues to degrade further. Everyone who follows this campaign will be kept apprised of our public hearing dates as they become known, which court house they will be held at, room number, how to attend, and other important procedural steps along the way. We are strong believers in the <a href="https://www.libelandprivacy.com/resources/the-open-court-principle-in-canada/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">open court</a> principle. Who Are You? My name is Kip Warner and I am the Executive Director behind CSASPP. This is not my day job. I am a volunteer doing this pro bono, like the rest of my team. You can reach us by email at reception at covidconstitutionalchallengebc dot ca or by calling reception at the number listed on our <a href="https://covidconstitutionalchallengebc.ca" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">website</a>. Contributors will not enter into a solicitor-client relationship with a lawyer engaged in the litigation. Our lawyer will have no direct duty to account or report on the litigation to you, but I certainly intend to. The lawyer can only accept instructions from the person who retained the lawyer. If any funds are not used, the law firm will return them to us and we will in turn return them to you. And lastly, my lawyer will have no involvement with the crowdfunding campaign.

Anonymous

Carol meekes

Vladimir Babakov

Garth Burnett

Stacey Hawryluk

John Langelo

chris anderson

Stephen Johnson

BC Supreme Court COVID-19 Constitutional Challenge

platform

Platform is iOS

Android

Adyen Google Pay Development Audience

$opt_dummy_attribute

English only

Deprecate Stripe Legacy

dyn_template_ids

Adyen V6 Bene Transfer & MyMoney Campaign Organizers - test01

Bene transfer V6 and AdyenV6MyMoney Campaign Organizers - production

OneTrust next-app audience

fundCountryCode

NextDoor Share Option Users

Fundraisers with Reactions feature capability

fundCurrencyCode

US + Non-charity COs Only

locale

fund country is US and user language is English

personId

comms-internal-person-ids

Enhanced Story Experience Users

Suggested Goal Experience Users

user language is English and fund country: US, AU, DK, FI, IE, NO, SE, CA, GB; 

Poster share - new funds eligible (newest 9/18)

Streaming widgets beta user

paymentProcessor

3DS payment method

user language is English and fundCountry: US, AU, DK, FI, IE, NO, SE, CA, GB; 

currencyCode

Money Box Donation List Prompt Experiment Audience

GoFundMe Employees

ipAddress

Mark Rieth IP Address

Version 9.2.0 and above

Fund is in English speaking country

desktop

Android v12.11.0 and above

Platform is Android

paymentMethodType

checkoutType

Payment method type group to be vaulted on success

admin pr kit prod

EUR Donation Upsell

Share Text generation Skip Fundraiser

(prod) new funds eligible for amp12 (UGC gallery)

fintrac_cad_idv_form_v2 audience

paymentProcessorAccountId

fallback mode accounts

proCampaignId

p2p legacy startfundraising page

AMP24 New Funds Only PROD (DO NOT MODIFY)

Eligible for Profile Share Badge

countryCode

charityId

UKCharities

Federated Search Internal Testing

route.pathname community

US Donation Upsell audience 

Auto Thanks Feature Audience

Supporter Comments Eligible Funds

International Only

fundId

braze fundraiser group 

Payment Identity Transfers ATO Risk Check (Targeted) - Production

Fundraiser Saved Payment Method Rate Limit Bypass (Production)

leaderboard-partner-id-audience-givepanel

Version 9.2.1 and above

AUD Donation Upsell audience

fundraiserCountryCode is US/EN

Active Fundraiser - Smart Default Cadence

DAF Internal

Vault on success card payment method

Platform is iOS v11.0.0 and above

Desktop users

Person ids

United States (US) users

allow yuno fundraisers for test

Mexico country code

Posters INTL

NPO Profile Opted-In

iOS at or above 12.4.0

non-US recurring donors

Canada Campaign Owner Group

Fundraiser Without Meta Link

Scheduler payment tester gorup

charityCommunityId

Charities allow to be claimed unclaimed (PRD)

Canada (CA) users

UC Tipping v20250115 International

pymk_production_xplr_fe_team

Android at or above 12.2.0

Profile photo entry point audience

smart goals (fundraiser/manage) on test01

Activity Tracking v1 Beta Testing

start gfm intl allowed locales

Platform is iOS v11.2.0 and above

NPO upsell education category

unclaimed charities

prod_ach_audience

AI Chatbot Audience

amp13 only new funds (prod) (anyword auto)

UC Flow Enabled (Prod)

Payment Identity Beneficiary Verification - Production

shared notification bell audience

Custom users

ach frontend audience

Android v11.0.0 and above

Users Receiving Payments Paused Notifications

smart goals test01

Manage Coach - US English Organizers Only + new funds only

Team EGG - IP Address list

NPO recommendations prod

Fundraiser Without Instagram Deep Link

Native 11.4.0 and above

UC Tipping v20250107

Users Receiving Braze KYC Validation Failed

ai_title_page

anyword

openai

control

manual_entry

userEmail

template_id

userId

fundUrl

isCharityCo

email

appVersion

shouldBucketIntoExperiment

isEligibleForProfileBadge

partnerId

donationCadence

isActiveFundraiser

isPartner

isMobile

npoProfileOptIn

fundIsLinkedWithMeta

hasSessionDonation

categoryGroup

isCampaignOwner

fundHasInstagramDeepLink

Native 11.3.0 and above

Native 11.4.0 and higher

New funds eligible - Video Sharing (PROD)

GB Donation Upsell audience 

Auto Thanks V3 Rollout Audience

Thank you V3 testing whitelist

isRecurringFriendly

Is Recurring Friendly

Excluded funds - Video Sharing

NPO upsell animals category

NPO upsell disaster relief category

Logged In Users

CH Donation Upsell audience

Android v10.6.0 and above

NPO upsell essential needs category

NPO upsell medical category

userCurrencyCode

Localized Currency

NPO upsell cancer category

v11.5.0 and above

testAudience

pathname

Survicate

appVersion is at or above 12.8.0

Non-charity fund

isChallengeFundraiser

challenge-fundraisers

Payment Identity Launch Verification - Production

New funds eligible - Posters v2

CAD Donation Upsell Audience

Braze Email Tester

NPO Profile Opted-Out

iOS App Version

hasKnownDonors

PYMK has donors

iOS v12.3.0 and above

BC Supreme Court COVID-19 Constitutional Challenge

Still $54,983 to go. Help us build momentum.