Fight For Justice -For all Australian Motorists
Donation protected
After enjoying coffee with friends at Mount Glorious Café (formerly Maiala Rainforest Teahouse and Restaurant) four of us headed home towards Samford Village through Highvale.
At the bottom of the downhill section, we passed a Holden Commodore travelling in the opposite direction which performed a U-turn and intercepted the first 3 motorcycles but letting the 4th ride past. All 3 riders were issued Infringement Notices based on the speed of the first rider at 76km/h
I was rider 2 and at the point where the Holden Commodore passes.
Rider 1 was pulling away from me and rider 3 was accelerating to catch up with rider 4 a short distance behind.
When I was accused by the Officer of travelling at 80km/h following rider 1 whom he had clocked at 76km/h but agreed he had slowed to 72km/h when he saw the car I knew a mistake had been made.
I’m going the distance to expose the truth as this issue is far greater than just a speeding ticket, and I welcome you all to join my journey.
If you have received or know of someone that has received an Infringement Notice in error – Please join me.
If you truly believe Infringement Notices are more about Revenue Raising than Road Safety – Please join me.
If you agree that the judicial system is unfair and as an Australian motorist issued with an Infringement Notice – YOU are guilty of the offence unless you take the matter to court at a considerable time, cost and risk - Please join me.
If you agree with your state traffic police operations, that when issued an infringement notice you should just pay up – Please join me.
If you accept the police statement “We are committed to providing high standards of behaviour, transparency and accountability” let me enlighten you – Please join me.
I have been convicted of the speeding offence based solely on the sworn evidence of the officer, no detailed evidence of which motorcycle is which, no number plates visible, just there is a motorcycle on the video evidence when the Mobile Radar display indicates the speed of 80km/h and that therefore has to be rider 2 even though rider 2 has already ridden past.
I believe I have gathered sufficient information to expose the truth but seek your support and assistance to continue this case further for the benefit to all Australian motorists.
Any donation amount will be greatly appreciated.
Keep checking at MotorBikeWriter.com for detailed case information.
At the bottom of the downhill section, we passed a Holden Commodore travelling in the opposite direction which performed a U-turn and intercepted the first 3 motorcycles but letting the 4th ride past. All 3 riders were issued Infringement Notices based on the speed of the first rider at 76km/h
I was rider 2 and at the point where the Holden Commodore passes.
Rider 1 was pulling away from me and rider 3 was accelerating to catch up with rider 4 a short distance behind.
When I was accused by the Officer of travelling at 80km/h following rider 1 whom he had clocked at 76km/h but agreed he had slowed to 72km/h when he saw the car I knew a mistake had been made.
I’m going the distance to expose the truth as this issue is far greater than just a speeding ticket, and I welcome you all to join my journey.
If you have received or know of someone that has received an Infringement Notice in error – Please join me.
If you truly believe Infringement Notices are more about Revenue Raising than Road Safety – Please join me.
If you agree that the judicial system is unfair and as an Australian motorist issued with an Infringement Notice – YOU are guilty of the offence unless you take the matter to court at a considerable time, cost and risk - Please join me.
If you agree with your state traffic police operations, that when issued an infringement notice you should just pay up – Please join me.
If you accept the police statement “We are committed to providing high standards of behaviour, transparency and accountability” let me enlighten you – Please join me.
I have been convicted of the speeding offence based solely on the sworn evidence of the officer, no detailed evidence of which motorcycle is which, no number plates visible, just there is a motorcycle on the video evidence when the Mobile Radar display indicates the speed of 80km/h and that therefore has to be rider 2 even though rider 2 has already ridden past.
I believe I have gathered sufficient information to expose the truth but seek your support and assistance to continue this case further for the benefit to all Australian motorists.
Any donation amount will be greatly appreciated.
Keep checking at MotorBikeWriter.com for detailed case information.
Organizer
Steven Jardine
Organizer
