Cole's Transgender Law Fund
Donation protected
I, Cole Prime , Petitioner in year-long family law case against felonious Cluster-B Respondent, shall be initiating a federal lawsuit against Ventura County Superior Court, naming Judge John R. Smiley specifically at minimum, for transgender discrimination, among other things. If at this point Judge Smiley is still contented with keeping my children from me (Respondent's aggravated kidnapping), I cannot imagine how many lives might have been harmfully impacted by Judge Smiley's inability to make fair, unbiased decisions in a timely manner.
I've already been told that a jury trial is not available to me for my family law case. If Judge Smiley hasn't changed his mind yet at the Ex Parte hearing of July 28, 2016 (with declarations of eight solid witnesses, ten pages of my further testimony, many solid exhibits, and the offering of the personal testimony of my daughter herself), then he wouldn't for September, leaving me no choice but to seek alternative legal means of remedy. The hearing for full custody of my biological daughter was again "denied" for not being "an emergency", despite my ongoing demonstration that the last ELEVEN MONTHS have been an emergency.
I have pressed charges against Respondent for her felonies, and a consolidated crime report at the local police department has been submitted to the District Attorney's Office, as suggested by two other judges at the court. I had informed Respondent's lawyer, in last hopes to avoid Respondent's possibility of jail time for what she's done. Instead, amazingly, the lawyer herself verbally confirmed to me, when asked outside the hearing on July 19, 2016, that she specifically represents her client [personally] and not the children. Respondent continues to strike, harass, and alienate my daughters, and Child Protective Services is questionably inactive, despite multiple calls and open investigations.
It's important to take sides, and apathy and closed judgement are the death of truth and fairness. I wish everyone I care about could never feel the pain of having their children stolen, and now that it's nearing the anniversary of being allowed to converse with my stepdaughters and missing both of their birthdays, I do hope both of them are being told sincerely by *someone* the truth that I love them and literally nothing has changed in that regard.
Inspired by Bernie Sanders, I'm going to address this conservative discrimination by Ventura County Superior Court officials. The Judge's apparent dislike for me is great enough that he is willing, at minimum, to expose my children to not only potential harm, but demonstrated harm. I'm not going to let this court do this to anyone else, and this case needs the assistance of people who know federal law.
U.S. Code, Title 42, Chapter 21, Subchapter I, § 1983
"Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia."
Learn more about the case at ColePrime.com
I've already been told that a jury trial is not available to me for my family law case. If Judge Smiley hasn't changed his mind yet at the Ex Parte hearing of July 28, 2016 (with declarations of eight solid witnesses, ten pages of my further testimony, many solid exhibits, and the offering of the personal testimony of my daughter herself), then he wouldn't for September, leaving me no choice but to seek alternative legal means of remedy. The hearing for full custody of my biological daughter was again "denied" for not being "an emergency", despite my ongoing demonstration that the last ELEVEN MONTHS have been an emergency.
I have pressed charges against Respondent for her felonies, and a consolidated crime report at the local police department has been submitted to the District Attorney's Office, as suggested by two other judges at the court. I had informed Respondent's lawyer, in last hopes to avoid Respondent's possibility of jail time for what she's done. Instead, amazingly, the lawyer herself verbally confirmed to me, when asked outside the hearing on July 19, 2016, that she specifically represents her client [personally] and not the children. Respondent continues to strike, harass, and alienate my daughters, and Child Protective Services is questionably inactive, despite multiple calls and open investigations.
It's important to take sides, and apathy and closed judgement are the death of truth and fairness. I wish everyone I care about could never feel the pain of having their children stolen, and now that it's nearing the anniversary of being allowed to converse with my stepdaughters and missing both of their birthdays, I do hope both of them are being told sincerely by *someone* the truth that I love them and literally nothing has changed in that regard.
Inspired by Bernie Sanders, I'm going to address this conservative discrimination by Ventura County Superior Court officials. The Judge's apparent dislike for me is great enough that he is willing, at minimum, to expose my children to not only potential harm, but demonstrated harm. I'm not going to let this court do this to anyone else, and this case needs the assistance of people who know federal law.
U.S. Code, Title 42, Chapter 21, Subchapter I, § 1983
"Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia."
Learn more about the case at ColePrime.com
Organiser
Cole Prime
Organiser
Oxnard, CA
